· Private foundation
Bli Metzurim Jbb Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $256k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YIDDISH NACHAS | $1,119,500 |
| THE OJC FUND | $346,700 |
| CONG KYL ISLAND VIEW | $100,000 |
| PLEDGER CHARITABLE | $96,550 |
| MISCELLANEOUS CHARITY LESS THAN 5000 | $59,698 |
| Individual grant recipient | $21,700 |
| MERKAZ TOLDOS A Y | $12,000 |
| ACHIEZER | $10,174 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,013 |
| EZRAS ALTA FEIGA | $6,000 |
| REIYVIM GAM TZMIYIM | $6,000 |
| OHR CHODOSH | $5,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,400 |
| KIPAS HADAYUNIM | $5,105 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YNYIDDISH NACHAS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $3.2M · 88% of their budget
- CKCONG KYL ISLAND VIEW2× · 2023–2024 · $400k
- MCMISCELLANEOUS CHARITY LESS THAN 50002× · 2023–2024 · $296k
Funded once
- CGCONG GEMACH BNEI PINCHOSone grant, 2023 · $100k
- MCMiscellanous Charity Less than 5000one grant, 2022 · $89k
- KSKOLLEL SATMAR OF KJone grant, 2023 · $37k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
To promote authentic orthodox judaisim by helping fund jewish causes worldwide.
Helping jewish community with rent, utilities, repairs, ect.
To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
To help disadvantaged children, widows and orphans by providing food, clothing, supplies and grants to charitable tax exempt organizations.
The organization was formed to award financial grants and/or loans free of interest, to religious orthodox jewish organizations and individuals who are in distress and need financial relief.
To help ill persons
To benefit needy individuals and their families; to promote, foster, increase and advance the health, welfare and economic status of low income families.
To provide financial assistance, including food and shelter, to needy individuals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tzedukas Huir Inc and the most unlike its peers is Toras Chesed Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 74% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Yiddish Nachas Inc · Rovna Ct Foundation · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Madanim Foundation · Jl Charitable Foundation · Tyrnauer Family Foundation · Bbc Foundation · Kee Seesu Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bli Metzurim Jbb Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.