· Public charity
Blazing Trees
We manage support-raising missionary funds and provide prayer, encouragement, and resources to leaders scattered across the nations.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Global Catalytic Ministries | $2,400 |
| Fond du Lac Christian School | $1,949 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,555 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,090 |
| Graceview Church | $850 |
| Global Gates | $500 |
| City Church Network | $500 |
| Audio Scripture Ministries | $250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Grants abroad, by region: $45k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Mission Work
Stated purpose: Mission Work
Stated purpose: Mission Work
Stated purpose: Mission Work
Stated purpose: Mission Work
Stated purpose: Mission Work
How this is measured
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Blazing Trees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blazing Trees. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Blazing Trees?
Find your warmest path to Blazing Trees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Blazing Trees’ filings →