Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Blau Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$815kEducation$301kPhilanthropy$120kRecreation & Sports$100kReligion$30kFood & Nutrition$25kYouth Development$24kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIPP NYC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION: $15k → 7%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $28k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$974k · 8 repeat orgs$481k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +58% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$974k
$476k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+58%

Still filing today

75%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2017–2018 · $633k · revenue +202% · 47% of their budget
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +76%
  • TN
    The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations
    2× · 2017–2018 · $66k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $110k · revenue +49%
  • SF
    SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $98k · revenue +305%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kipp Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
18/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Michigan — $633,333 · OtherUniversity of MichiganSLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $82,129 · OtherSLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERTRINITY SCHOOL — $56,500 · OtherTRINITY SCHOOL+10 more — $56,569 · Other+10 moreSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $98,000 · EducationSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $70,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $66,040 · EducationThe New York Public Libr…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $47,250 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE…EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK — $25,000 · EducationEDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YO…+1 more — $10,000 · EducationROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $110,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $28,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · ReligionGIRLS INC — $24,460 · Youth Development
Other$828,531Education$316,290Philanthropy$110,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Human Services$45,500Religion$30,000Youth Development$24,460

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan — $633,333 over 2y, 47% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $98,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $66,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $47,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $28,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGIRLS INC — $24,460 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF GEORGICA POND FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $9,819 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health — $5,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blau Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph