Skip to content

· Private foundation

Black Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$130kCommunity Improvement$46kReligion$44kYouth Development$37kPhilanthropy$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$34kHuman Services$23kHealth$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARBLE FALLS CHURCH OF CHRIST$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$5,750
ROUND MOUNTAIN VFD$5,750
NEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC$5,750
PHOENIX CENTER$5,750
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
WHITE ROCK LAKE CONSERVANCY$5,000
FOREST HILLS SECURITY PROGRAM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPEFULLY SOW: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314k · 13 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$314k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+68%

Still filing today

69%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    Forest Hills Security Program
    6× · 2019–2025 · $46k · revenue +16%
  • RM
    ROUND MTN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +10%
  • NH
    NEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BS
    BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • BC
    BLINN COLLEGE FINANCIAL AIDE
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • TA
    TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sand Hills Volunteer Fire Department Inc

To provide fire protection, education, emergency medical treatment and rescue services to approx 140 sq miles in guadalupe county texas.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
South Brazos County Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Department, providing fire, rescue, and medical services to a population of approximately 22,000 residents, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Dallas Volunteer Fire Dept

To protect lives and property

—
4
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
5
Dallas Police Helicopter Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
6
Texas Intrastate Fire Mutual Aid System Foundation

Supporting the Texas Intrastate Fire Mutual Aid System

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Pecan Plantation Volunteer Fire Dpt & Emergency Medical Services Inc

Provides protection of property and preservation of life from and during fire or other emergencies within the area of its operation in hood and johnson counties, texas. also, provides rescue and various other emergency services in the…

—
8
Nocona Rural Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Volunteer firefighting of all fires in the rural areas around nocona texas including assisting other fire departments during large fires in their areas.

—
9
Dallas Fallen Officer Foundation

To provide financial support and programs for fallen officer families. To raise awareness and advocate for national issues impacting officers.

—
10
University of North Texas Health Science Center At Ft Worth Health Systems

To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.

Health
11
Scotland Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Indian Creek Volunteer Fire Dept

Indian creek volunteer fire department provides fire, rescue, and emergency medical services to the indian creek fire district in cooke county, texas.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New Horizons Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Johnson City Vol Fire Dept. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TX TECH ALUMNI SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $90,460 · OtherTX TECH ALUMNI SCHOLARSHIP FUNDMARBLE FALLS CHURCH OF CHRIST: $41,500 · OtherMARBLE FALLS CHURCH OF CHRISTNEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC: $21,250 · OtherNEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INCBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE FOUNDATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $11,750 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBHIGHLAND LAKES BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $8,000 · Other+9 more: $23,714 · Other+9 moreForest Hills Security Program: $46,000 · Community ImprovementForest Hills …Texas A&M Foundation: $20,495 · EducationTexas A&M…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationSTEPHEN S…SOUTHWEST TRANSPLANT ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSOUTHWEST…PHOENIX CENTER: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsWHITE ROCK LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $11,500 · Recreation & SportsROUND MTN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $23,294 · Public Safety & DisasterJOHNSON CITY VOL FIRE DEPT: $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $16,250 · PhilanthropyHILL COUNTRY 100 CLUB INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthHopefully Sow: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$211,674Community Improvement$46,000Education$32,995Recreation & Sports$29,000Public Safety & Disaster$27,294Philanthropy$21,250Health$13,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetForest Hills Security Program: $46,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetROUND MTN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $23,294 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetNEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC: $21,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $20,495 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX CENTER: $17,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $16,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE ROCK LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $11,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILL COUNTRY 100 CLUB INC: $5,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST TRANSPLANT ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetJOHNSON CITY VOL FIRE DEPT: $4,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BLANCO COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Forest Hills Security Program ↗
  • Who funds ROUND MTN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WHITE ROCK LAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY 100 CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST TRANSPLANT ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON CITY VOL FIRE DEPT ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Hopefully Sow ↗
  • Who funds NORTH BLANCO COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Black Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Black Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Black Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph