· Public charity
Black Emotional and Mental Health Collec
To remove the barriers that black people experience getting access to or staying connected with emotional health care and healing through education, training, advocacy, and the creative arts.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $110,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $227,121 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $117,121 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DARKNESS RISING PROJECT | $15,000 |
| BLACK SPACE HQ | $10,000 |
| ADVANCEOC | $10,000 |
| THRIVE SS INC | $10,000 |
| PEEL DEM LAYERS BACK CO ARCHIE GREEN | $10,000 |
| ALLIES IN ARTS | $10,000 |
| PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES | $10,000 |
| SWEET HEARTS INC | $8,000 |
| THE SOCIAL JUSTICE CENTER | $8,000 |
| ZEPP WELLNESS CENTER | $8,000 |
| IN CULTURED COMPANY | $6,000 |
| WALKGOOD INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mental health services advocacy
Support Black Survivors of Sexual Abuse
The Asian Mental Health Collective fosters healing, resilience and connection in Asian communities in the US through culturally-informed clinical services, virtual peer support spaces, and support for Asian mental health providers.
Wellness Project New Orleans' mission is to provide holistic, trauma informed, and culturally competent mental health and wellness services to individuals and families, and to support practitioners (with an emphasis on BIPOC- Black,…
Women Thriving creates opporunities for women facing economic social and racial inequalities.
Donating items to psychiatric patients
Help family find mental health services
Providing antiracism training and trauma psychotherapy
To provide culturally specific mental health services to Black Indigenous and People of Other Colors and Cultures BIPOCC to achieve mental wellness.cu;
Holistic Healing for victims of assault
To provide services and support to the youth in underserved communities
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advance Oc and the most unlike its peers is Walkgood Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2018–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Black Emotional and Mental Health Collec funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Black Emotional and Mental Health Collec?
Find your warmest path to Black Emotional and Mental Health Collec through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.