Skip to content
Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$475k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.7MPhilanthropy$735kCivil Rights$21kEnvironment$15kInternational$10kEducation$9kYouth Development$4kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $110k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $223k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $142k
$7,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NACHLAT YEHOSHUA$89,000
Bnos Zion Of Bobov$53,000
Kollel Zichron Chaim D'Bobov$40,000
CONG MACHNE CHAIM INC$20,600
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Congregation Dorog$16,000
U T A Of Monsey$15,400
Cong Noiam Mgodim$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$13,800
KHAL CHASIDEI SKVERE INC$13,000
MOSDOS SATMAR BP INC$11,900
American Friends Of Sharai Daas$11,800
Yeshiva Nachlas Hatorah Of Krula$10,500
Ach Tov V'chesed$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YISROEL RELIEF FUND: $1k → 11%Bonei Olam: $4k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 41 repeat orgs$613k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
58

Total granted

$2.1M
$521k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+48%

Still filing today

7%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
    3× · 2018–2020 · $731k
  • BZ
    BNOS ZION OF BOBOV INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $253k
  • KZ
    Kollel Zichron Chaim D'Bobov
    6× · 2017–2025 · $169k

Funded once

  • CK
    Cong Kahal Minchas Chinuch
    one grant, 2024 · $104k
  • YO
    YESHIVA OHR TORAH D M OF BROOKLYN
    one grant, 2024 · $55k
  • CD
    Cong Dvar Moshe Horodenke
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $730,535 · OtherDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTBNOS ZION OF BOBOV INC: $253,000 · OtherBNOS ZION OF BOBOV INCKollel Zichron Chaim D'Bobov: $169,100 · OtherKollel Zichron Chaim D'BobovCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $148,200 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCNACHLAT YEHOSHUA: $139,000 · OtherCong Kahal Minchas Chinuch: $103,615 · Other+101 more: $1,160,498 · Other+101 moreBonei Olam Inc: $3,600 · Human ServicesYISROEL RELIEF FUND: $1,360 · Human ServicesYeshivas Talmideini Inc: $3,800 · Youth DevelopmentYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $3,600 · EducationKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $1,385 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $1,100 · Religion
Other$2,703,948Human Services$4,960Youth Development$3,800Education$3,600International$1,385Religion$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshivas Talmideini Inc: $3,800 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $1,385 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundB&M Steinmetz Foundat…Cohen Ld Family Found…Sdei Israel Foundatio…S&W Foundation IncYms Foundation IncAmerican Friends of B…Chavie Stern Family F…Zelig and Rifky Weiss…The Lexicon Foundatio…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…S&E Foundation
The Ojc FundNY72.8× affinity57 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc · Sdei Israel Foundation Inc · S&W Foundation Inc · Yms Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Chavie Stern Family Foundation Inc · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · S&E Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Birkas Rosh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home