Skip to content

· Private foundation

Binyan Avrohom Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$232kInternational$110kPhilanthropy$51kHealth$17kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k42 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$371
Median grant
7
States reached
$714k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$18,800
AMER FRIENDS OF RABIN HOSPITAL$13,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
KINDNESS FUND-SHUVA CENTER$9,180
FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND$7,300
Individual grant recipient$6,000
GIVELIVELY$4,700
KEREN KIRYAT SEFER$4,000
NEFESH YEHUDI INC$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,100
KEREN ICHUD KEHILOT HADAR GANIM$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
ISRAEL SELECT CHARITY FUNDS$1,800
MEKOR CHAIM$1,180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 68% of grant dollars ($395k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 32% that went abroad ($186k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%NEEMAN FOUNDATION: $360 → 9%LIFE'S DOOR: $250 → 17%LIFE'S DOOR: $250 → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI I: $3k → 6%LIFE'S DOOR: $250 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI I: $1k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI I: $720 → 6%LIFE'S DOOR: $200 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI I: $500 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI I: $500 → 6%LIFE'S DOOR: $200 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI I: $360 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI I: $360 → 6%LIFE'S DOOR: $200 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $180 → 11%LIFE'S DOOR: $180 → 20%CHILDRENS BRIDGE ZICHRON MENACHEM: $250 → 17%ZAKA SEARCH AND RESCUE INC: $2k → 17%ZAKA SEARCH AND RESCUE INC: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MD
SC
DC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 32% of all-years giving ($186k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$186k · 130 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Binyan Avrohom Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Binyan Avrohom Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 32% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$385k · 80 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

80 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
72

Total granted

$385k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+36%

Still filing today

33%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHASDEI DAVID INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +50%
  • NY
    NEFESH YEHUDIE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +29%
  • AG
    AMERICA GIVES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +216%

Funded once

  • CD
    CHASE DAVID co J EIDELMAN
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • AT
    AMUTAT TZEIRI HADAR GANIM
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • MW
    MAIMON WORLD CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
2
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
3
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
5
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
6
American Friends of Daas Aharon Inc

To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.

Education
7
Sherit Isroel
—
8
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
9
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
10
Friends of Tzeirei Chabad in Israel Inc

To pursue a greater outreach of knowledge of the Jewish Torah and to further educate the less knowledgeable

Religion
11
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
12
American Friends of Keshet Yehuda Nfp

religious and educational program for post high school youth

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Leket Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ne'eman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 172 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/41
Grantees still filing
29/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $47,880 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIMREI SHEFER INSTITUTE: $29,000 · OtherIMREI SHEFER INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient: $25,540 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF ASOR FUND: $13,720 · OtherAMER FRIENDS OF RABIN HOSPITAL: $13,000 · Other+132 more: $238,089 · Other+132 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $85,520 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS IN…CHASDEI DAVID INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI DAVID INCKEREN KIRYAT SEFER INC: $20,600 · PhilanthropyKEREN KIRYAT SEFER INCAMERICA GIVES INC: $8,404 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC+3 more: $5,480 · PhilanthropyNEFESH YEHUDIE INC: $28,800 · ReligionOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $3,160 · ReligionKOLLEL TORAH TEMIMAH INC: $1,750 · Religion+4 more: $2,350 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI: $6,240 · Human ServicesIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $3,782 · Human ServicesLIFE'S DOOR INC: $1,530 · Human Services+3 more: $790 · Human ServicesNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $3,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $1,800 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH: $1,460 · InternationalMAKOR CHAIM USA INC: $1,190 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHVUT AMI: $1,100 · InternationalJUST ONE LIFE INC: $658 · International+4 more: $680 · InternationalFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $3,645 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $430 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $180 · Arts & CultureCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,160 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $363 · Health
Other$367,229Philanthropy$150,004Religion$36,060Human Services$12,342International$9,888Arts & Culture$4,255Health$1,523

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $85,520 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI DAVID INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNEFESH YEHUDIE INC: $28,800 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetKEREN KIRYAT SEFER INC: $20,600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $8,404 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI: $6,240 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $3,782 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $3,645 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $3,160 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL TORAH TEMIMAH INC: $1,750 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE'S DOOR INC: $1,530 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCHAVERIM ISRAEL FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,510 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH: $1,460 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $1,260 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,224 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKOR CHAIM USA INC: $1,190 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,160 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNefesh B'Nefesh Jewish Souls United Inc: $1,120 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHVUT AMI: $1,100 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIMAD ALON MOREH INC: $1,080 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Puah Inc: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUST ONE LIFE INC: $658 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $363 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAdi Israel Foundation Inc: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNER AVRAHAM INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS BRIDGE OF ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVIV HA TORAH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI DAVID INC ↗
  • Who funds NEFESH YEHUDIE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN KIRYAT SEFER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI ↗
  • Who funds Israel Magen Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHUVU RETURN INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
  • Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY38.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Cherna Moskowitz Foundation · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · The Irving I Moskowitz Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · Fjc · The David and Cheryl Unterberg Charitable Foundation Trust · Mzl 40 Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Binyan Avrohom Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Binyan Avrohom Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Binyan Avrohom Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Binyan Avrohom Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 172 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Binyan Avrohom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph