Skip to content

· Private foundation

Big Win Philanthropy Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$7.8MInternational$2.0MEmployment$440kHealth$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kEnvironment$11kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $317k
  • $250k+4 grants · $4.7M
$84,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$139M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$2,457,521
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION GHANA$1,423,337
REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH$527,304
ADDIS ABABA CITY ADMINISTRATION ECD INITIATIVE$274,944
DIGITAL SKILLS FOUNDATION$149,200
OROMIA REGIONAL GOVERNMENT ORGO$84,000
AMHARA NATIONAL REGIONAL STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT OFFICE$84,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$21,657
LAST MILE HEALTH$14,654
CULTIVAID - ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$11,353
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$5,000
EDUCATE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 40% of grant dollars ($4.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 60% that went abroad ($6.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE TRUSTEES OF SMITH COLLEGE: $37k → 12%LAST MILE HEALTH: $15k → 16%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $10k → 14%DIGITAL SKILLS FOUNDATION: $450k → 17%THE CARTER CENTER: $5k → 14%EDUCATE: $5k → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $22k → 19%THE TRUSTEES OF SMITH COLLEGE: $5k → 12%INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF ELTON JOHN AIDS FDN: $50k → 17%DIGITAL SKILLS FOUNDATION: $149k → 17%EDUCATE: $5k → 12%NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 60% of all-years giving ($6.3M)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ethiopia$3.4M · 11 grants
Ghana$2.2M · 2 grants
France$599k · 2 grants
Malawi$50k · 1 grant
Senegal$17k · 1 grant
Israel$11k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Big Win Philanthropy Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Big Win Philanthropy Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 61% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 5 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$4.7M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+16%

Still filing today

20%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $407k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalSocial ScienceHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION GHANA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.2M
  • RO
    REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.8M
  • DS
    DIGITAL SKILLS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $599k

Funded once

  • AA
    ADDIS ABABA CITY ADMINISTRATION
    one grant, 2023 · $913k
  • TM
    THE MUSEUM FOR AFRICAN ART D/B/A THE AFRICA CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $163k · revenue +60%
  • MO
    MINISTRY OF LABOUR & SKILLS - ETHIOPIA
    one grant, 2023 · $122k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
11
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Myriad Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York Public Radio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION GHANA: $2,165,722 · OtherMINISTRY OF EDUCATION GHANAREPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH: $1,796,077 · OtherREPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF HEALTHADDIS ABABA CITY ADMINISTRATION: $913,292 · OtherADDIS ABABA CITY ADMINISTRATIONDIGITAL SKILLS FOUNDATION: $599,200 · OtherDIGITAL SKILLS FOUNDATIONADDIS ABABA CITY ADMINISTRATION ECD INITIATIVE: $274,944 · Other+11 more: $594,926 · Other+11 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,810,454 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College+2 more: $63,674 · EducationTHE MUSEUM FOR AFRICAN ART D/B/A THE AFRICA CENTER: $163,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMYRIAD USA INC: $20,080 · InternationalEducate: $10,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $5,000 · InternationalLAST MILE HEALTH: $14,654 · HealthTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $10,000 · Social Science
Other$6,344,161Education$3,874,128Arts & Culture$173,000International$35,080Health$14,654Social Science$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,810,454 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM FOR AFRICAN ART D/B/A THE AFRICA CENTER: $163,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $42,017 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $21,657 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $20,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAST MILE HEALTH: $14,654 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEducate: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM FOR AFRICAN ART D/B/A THE AFRICA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION UK ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LAST MILE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Educate ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Childrens Investment Fund Foundation Dba Big Win Philanthropy C/O Day PitneyCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Childrens Investment Fund Foundation Dba Big Win Philanthropy C/O Day Pitney · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Big Win Philanthropy Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Big Win Philanthropy Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Big Win Philanthropy’s filings →

More from the funding graph