Skip to content
Big Bend Homeless Assistance Continuum of Care Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Big Bend Homeless Assistance Continuum of Care Inc

Develop and implement strategies to help end homelessness in the Big Bend of Florida through accurate and meaningful data, high-quality best practices and evidence based interventions.

$670k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$320k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $321k
  • $250k+1 grant · $320k
$63,906
Median grant
1
States reached
$359k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BEND HOMELESS COALITION INC$320,140
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NW FL$102,478
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NORTH FLORIDA INC$101,293
CAPITAL CITY YOUTH SERVICES INC$63,906
CESC INC$53,677
INVESTING IN OUR YOUTH$17,645
EMERGENCY CARE HELP ORGANIZATION$10,571
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CAPITAL CITY YOUTH SERVICES INC: $64k → 19%INVESTING IN OUR YOUTH: $18k → 26%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NORTH FLORIDA INC: $101k → 19%CESC INC: $54k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BEND HOMELESS COALITION INC: $320,140 · OtherBIG BEND HOMELESS COALITION INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA: $102,478 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA+1 more: $10,571 · OtherCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NORTH FLORIDA INC: $101,293 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NORTH F…CAPITAL CITY YOUTH SERVICES INC: $63,906 · Human ServicesCAPITAL CITY YOUTH SERVICES INCCESC Inc: $53,677 · Human ServicesCESC IncINVESTING IN OUR YOUTH INC: $17,645 · Human ServicesINVESTING IN OUR YOUTH INC
Other$433,189Human Services$236,521

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG BEND HOMELESS COALITION INC: $320,140 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA: $102,478 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NORTH FLORIDA INC: $101,293 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCAPITAL CITY YOUTH SERVICES INC: $63,906 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCESC Inc: $53,677 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEMERGENCY CARE HELP ORGANIZATION INC: $10,571 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Big…Big Bend Homeless Coa…Capital City Bank Gro…The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of the Big Bend IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Big Bend Inc · Big Bend Homeless Coalition Inc · Capital City Bank Group Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Big Bend Homeless Assistance Continuum of Care Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Big Bend Homeless Assistance Continuum of Care Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Big Bend Homeless Coalition Inc: 65% of income from government
  • Center for Independent Living of North Florida Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Capital City Youth Services Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.0M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Big Bend Homeless Assistance Continuum of Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home