Skip to content

· Private foundation

Betsy Ross Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$455kAnimals$90kHuman Services$90kHousing & Shelter$37kRecreation & Sports$35kHealth$33kYouth Development$25kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$22,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE MARTIN$20,000
HOPE IN MURRAY$6,500
HENRY COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
MILITARY WORKING DOG TEAM SUPPORT ASSOCIATION$5,000
REAL HOPE YOUTH CENTER$5,000
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
FRIENDS OF TENNESSEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE$3,000
RESTORE MINISTRIES$2,500
LEVI MILES FOUNDATION$2,500
THISTLE FARMS$2,500
OWL RIDGE RAPTOR CENTER$2,000
WINGS TO SOAR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUTH VILLAGES: $3k → 17%youth villages: $3k → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES: $3k → 17%damascus road: $3k → 16%DAMASCUS ROAD: $3k → 16%DAMASCUS ROAD: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$767k · 23 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
7

Total granted

$767k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+22%

Still filing today

48%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    MILITARY WORKING DOG TEAM SUPPORT ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • ED
    EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $29k · revenue +125%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF TENNESSEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • LB
    LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • MG
    MASTER GARDNERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY TENNESSEE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • KS
    KENTUCKY STATE PARK EAGLE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
2
Mountain Tails Wildlife Rehab

Wildlife rehabitation

Animals
3
For Fox Sake Wildlife Rescue

Our goal is to rescue and provide care to orphaned and injured native wildlife in the state of Tennessee with a focus on rabies vector species We also provide education to the public via social media and our non-releasable ambassador…

Animals
4
Wings of Hope Inc
Animals
5
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
6
The Remnant House

The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…

Health
7
Islands of Hope Dream Center

Islands of Hope Dream Center exists to restore hope and dignity to women who have survived human trafficking and sexual exploitation. Our mission is to provide a safe, Christ-centered home where each woman is welcomed into a community,…

Public Benefit
8
Southern Wildlife Rehab Inc

Wildlife Rehabilitation

—
9
East Coast Wildlife Rehab Center Inc

Wildlife refuge and recovery of endangered species

Animals
10
Rooster Haus Rescue
Animals
11
Second Chance Wildlife Rehabilitation

Our mission is to take care of sick, injured or orphaned animals and when healed, return them to their natural habitat and, through education, promote an awareness of and appreciation for utah's diverse wildlife for the sake of future…

Animals
12
Wet Mountain Wildlife Rehabilitatio
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Real Hope Youth Center; the most unlike its peers is Gods Promises Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $227,500 · OtherMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE MARTIN: $125,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE MARTINUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEEHENRY COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $54,000 · OtherHENRY COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLHOPE IN MURRAY: $45,750 · OtherHOPE IN MURRAYTHISTLE FARMS INC: $22,500 · Other+14 more: $55,000 · Other+14 moreMILITARY WORKING DOG TEAM SUPPORT ASSOCIATION INC: $45,000 · AnimalsMILITARY WO…FRIENDS OF TENNESSEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: $23,500 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF …OWL RIDGE RAPTOR CENTER INCORPORATED: $8,000 · AnimalsOWL RIDGE R…Wings to Soar: $5,500 · AnimalsWings to So…EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC: $29,000 · Housing & ShelterSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LEVI MILES FOUNDATION: $5,500 · PhilanthropyREAL HOPE YOUTH CENTER: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesDAMASCUS ROAD INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$604,750Animals$82,000Housing & Shelter$29,000Philanthropy$25,500Youth Development$25,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILITARY WORKING DOG TEAM SUPPORT ASSOCIATION INC: $45,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetEIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC: $29,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetREAL HOPE YOUTH CENTER: $25,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF TENNESSEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: $23,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOWL RIDGE RAPTOR CENTER INCORPORATED: $8,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWings to Soar: $5,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE LEVI MILES FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILITARY WORKING DOG TEAM SUPPORT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds REAL HOPE YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TENNESSEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OWL RIDGE RAPTOR CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
  • Who funds DAMASCUS ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Wings to Soar ↗
  • Who funds THE LEVI MILES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GODS PROMISES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Betsy Ross Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Betsy Ross Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Betsy Ross Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Betsy Ross Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Betsy Ross’ filings →

    More from the funding graph