· Private foundation
Besad Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $233k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $405k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONG GEMACH BNEI PINCHOS | $230,000 |
| CONGREGATION ZICHRON MENACHEM INC | $75,000 |
| KEREN YAD V'EIZER INC | $50,000 |
| CONGREGATION & GMACH ZICHRON SHLOMO | $50,000 |
| CONGREGATION KEREN EZRAH INC | $41,500 |
| UNITED BOBOV INTERNATIONAL | $35,000 |
| CONGREGATION NEIR BARUCH LINZ | $32,413 |
| CONGREGATION KHAL SHAAREI ZION BOBOV INC | $24,000 |
| KOLEL SHARY LIMUD | $24,000 |
| CHASDEI AVOS | $22,000 |
| YESHIVA LAVREICHIM METZUYANIM INC | $20,000 |
| KOLLEL METZYIONIM LHOROAH OF WILLIAMSBURG | $20,000 |
| CAMP ZICHRON ZVI DOVID CONGREGATION | $13,700 |
| KUPAT HAKODESH INC | $7,000 |
| MACHNE GILA | $6,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · S&W Foundation Inc · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Fund for Life Foundation Inc · Chavie Stern Family Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Frankel Brothers Foundation · Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc · Vyazreim Inc · Chayim V Chesed
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Besad Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.