Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bernard J & Jeanne M Lawler Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$14kAnimals$5kHuman Services$3kReligion$3kHealth$3kFood & Nutrition$2kInternational$900Public Safety & Disaster$800Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
3
States reached
$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOVE FUND OF THE CENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,200
INTERFAITH WORKS$400
SAVE THE CHILDREN$300
SAMARITAN CENTER$300
ST JUDE$300
GOLISANO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$300
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$250
HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$200
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$150
WYATT LUCHSINGER FUND$100
TULLY HILL TREATMENT & RECOVERY$100
AURORA OF CNY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30k · 14 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$30k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-40%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO AT BURNET PARK INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • SC
    SAMARITAN CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +30%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $600 · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $800 · revenue -40%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $800
  • IW
    INTERFAITH WORKS - AFGAHN PLIGHT
    one grant, 2021 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
3
Central New York Community Foundation Inc

Our mission is to foster a thriving and equitable central new york region by leading and inspiring a community culture of giving, celebrating legacy and stewarding charitable resources for today and tomorrow.

Philanthropy
4
Security Council Report Inc

See schedule osecurity council report was established to provide timely, accurate, and objective information and analysis on the activities of the united nations security council. this information and analysis is provided for the benefit…

Education
5
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
6
Ny Community Fridge Corp

Using the power of volunteers and community partnerships to expand dignified access to food in the heart of disadvantaged communities.

Food & Nutrition
7
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
8
United Way of Central New York Inc

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.

Philanthropy
9
United Way of New York State

To strengthen the capacity of local united ways through their charitable human service activities to be leaders in achieving results that improve the lives of all new yorkers.

Philanthropy
10
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
11
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
12
Women's Foodservice Forum

Accelerate the advancement of women leaders in the food industry. we believe in limitless opportunity for all women.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Samaritan Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Save the Children Federation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOVE FUND OF THE CENTRAL NEW YORK C: $11,450 · OtherDOVE FUND OF THE CENTRAL NEW YORK CCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESDOVE FUND OF THE CENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,400 · OtherDOVE FUND OF THE CENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONSAMARITAN CENTER INC: $2,266 · OtherSAMARITAN CENTER INCGOLISANO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $2,266 · OtherGOLISANO CHILDRENS HOSPITALINTERFAITH WORKS - AFGHAN PLIGHT: $1,150 · Other+8 more: $3,400 · Other+8 moreFRIENDS OF THE ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO AT BURNET PARK INC: $5,325 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE ROS…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $800 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $600 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300 · InternationalHILLSIDE FOUNDATION: $400 · Human Services
Other$25,432Animals$5,325International$1,700Human Services$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO AT BURNET PARK INC: $5,325 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN CENTER INC: $2,266 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH WORKS OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSIDE FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO AT BURNET PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH WORKS OF CENTRAL NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The John Ben Snow Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The John Ben Snow Foundation Inc · The Rosamond Gifford Charitable Corporation · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bernard J & Jeanne M Lawler Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bernard J & Jeanne M Lawler Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bernard J & Jeanne M Lawler Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph