· Private foundation
Berko Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k75 grants · $92k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $98k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESODEI HADAS | $97,568 |
| MONMOUTH TORAH LINKS | $34,828 |
| EZRAS NASHIM | $24,996 |
| THE CORNER MINYAN (CLUB TCM) | $24,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,750 |
| SHALOM HERITAGE CENTER | $10,500 |
| CHAI LIFELINE | $7,500 |
| KOLLEL HORAAH OF AMERICAS | $7,000 |
| PARTNERS IN TORAH | $5,000 |
| BATYA GIRLS | $3,900 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF WESTERN MONMOUTH COUNTY | $2,970 |
| RABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA | $2,830 |
| J-BEATZ | $2,750 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 71 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- YHYESODEI HADAS INC8× · 2018–2025 · $485k · revenue -32% · 44% of their budget
- MTMONMOUTH TORAH LINKS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $374k · revenue -2%
- CUCONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 50008× · 2017–2024 · $271k
Funded once
- TDTACHBULOS-STRATEGIES DBA PROJECT INNOCENT HEARTone grant, 2017 · $60k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $13k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
To provide religious mentoring and spiritual counseling to orthodox teenage students
The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Jewish educational programs
To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.
Religious School
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
To provide support to yeshivath beth yehudah's adult education program
How this is measured
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Berko Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Berko Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Berko Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Berko Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Berko Family’s filings →