Skip to content
Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks 1862 Hillsboro at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks 1862 Hillsboro

The hillsboro elks lodge is a fraternal lodge that is dedicated to serving its members by operating a lodge and social club and also serving the community through charitable programs.

$49k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$35kHuman Services$33kPublic Benefit$21kCrime & Legal$21kRecreation & Sports$10kFood & Nutrition$10kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $18,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $49,300 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,300 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$8,000
ROCK N' ROOMS$5,000
HILLSBORO K9 FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELEVATE HIM: $5k → 8%PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8k → 12%ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%HILLSBORO K9 FOUNDATION: $14k → 8%HILLSBORO FARMERS MARKET: $10k → 8%GLENCOE YOUTH FOOTBALL: $10k → 8%HILLSBORO K9 FOUNDATION: $7k → 8%HILLSBORO K9 FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%ROCK N' ROOMS: $18k → 8%ROCK N' ROOMS: $17k → 8%HOW CAN WE HELP: $12k → 8%HOW CAN WE HELP: $10k → 8%ROCK N' ROOMS: $5k → 8%REBUILDING TOGETHER: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 4 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$103k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+28%

Still filing today

50%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25’26
Public BenefitPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RN
    ROCK N ROOMS
    3× · 2023–2026 · $40k · revenue -29% · 30% of their budget
  • HK
    HILLSBORO K9 FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2026 · $26k
  • HC
    HOW CAN WE HELP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k

Funded once

  • HF
    Hillsboro Farmers Markets Incgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue +62%
  • GC
    Glencoe Community Football Incorporated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Honor Flight of Central Oregon

Military Veterans trips to Washington DC

Public Benefit
2
Warfighter Outfitters

Warfighter Outfitters believe in the healing power of the outdoors. Since 2014, we have provided free fishing, hunting, and engagement trips to disabled veterans. On the water or in the woods, these veteran-only trips help service men and…

—
3
Honor Flight of Oregon

Transporting qualified military service veterans

Public Benefit
4
Helicopters for Heroes
Human Services
5
Friends of the Hunt

Funding for the physical preservation of the historic Lake Oswego Hunt arena, and public awareness and tours thereof.

Arts & Culture
6
The Veterans & First Responders Board of Sw Wa

We provide food, clothing, special projects and gifts to bereaved of vets and first responders as well as to VFW projects

—
7
Inland Northwest Honor Flight

Inland Northwest Honor Flight conducted two trips in 2025; in April & October. Roughly one hundred eighty five WWII Korean War and primarily Vietnam War veterans were transported at no cost to them. They were taken from Spokane WA to…

Arts & Culture
8
Earth Day Oregon
—
9
Furnish Hope Inc

Furnish hope creates awareness about essential home furnishing insecurity as well as transform empty houses into welcoming homes for families. together, we furnish hope.

Human Services
10
We Ride So They Fly

Raising funds for Honor Flight New England to transport WWI, Korean War, and Vietnam veterans on a free trip to Washington D.C., to visit and reflect at their memorials. They show our most senior heroes that America has not forgotten their…

Public Benefit
11
Homes for Heroes Foundation
Housing & Shelter
12
Heroes Hunting Foundation

The heroes hunting foundation will utilize the peace of the outdoors, the comfort of an understanding peer, and a media outlet, if desired, to assist veterans with the reintegration process after returning home from deployment. peer to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elks National Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Glencoe Community Football Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HILLSBORO K9 FOUNDATION: $25,530 · OtherHILLSBORO K9 FOUNDATIONHOW CAN WE HELP: $21,654 · OtherHOW CAN WE HELPGlencoe Community Football Incorporated: $10,000 · OtherGlencoe Community Football IncorporatedREBUILDING TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $9,570 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY INCELEVATE HIM: $5,415 · OtherELEVATE HIMROCK N ROOMS: $39,992 · Youth DevelopmentROCK N ROOMSHONOR FLIGHT OF PORTLAND OREGON: $15,713 · Public BenefitHONOR FLIGHT OF…HOPE FOR HEROES INC: $5,404 · Public BenefitHOPE FOR HEROES…PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyPORTLAND C…ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,357 · PhilanthropyELKS NATIO…Hillsboro Farmers Markets Inc: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$72,169Youth Development$39,992Public Benefit$21,117Philanthropy$14,357Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCK N ROOMS: $39,992 over 3y, 30% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT OF PORTLAND OREGON: $15,713 over 2y, 10% of budgetGlencoe Community Football Incorporated: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $9,570 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HEROES INC: $5,404 over 1y, 7.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks 1862 Hillsboro funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks 1862 Hillsboro. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks 1862 Hillsboro’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home