Skip to content

· Public charity

Ben Franklin Technology Partners Ne Pa

Our mission is to promote, sustain and invest in the transformation of our regional economy through innovation and partnering.

$368k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$3.6MEmployment$484kScience & Tech$135kEnvironment$134kHealth$111kEducation$68kCrime & Legal$43kFood & Nutrition$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $348,215, the rows itemized in this filing. The $368,399 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,184 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $276k
$13,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IHE BEV$27,500
JED POOLS$27,500
NOVA TECH AUTOMATION$27,500
HUMAN ACTIVE TECHNOLOGY$27,500
AMERICAN CRANE AND EQUIPMENT$27,500
SUMITOMO CRYOGENICS OF AMERICA$21,877
SOLAR TECHNOLOGY$20,000
GENTEX CORPORATION$20,000
FM BROWN$18,480
UNIVERSAL COMPRESSED AIR$15,990
BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY$15,000
WACKER SILICONE$13,750
LEVAN MACHINE CO$13,090
EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY$7,500
SCRANTON ENTERPRISE CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOND METAL SURPLUS INC: $35k → 6%FLUORTEK: $25k → 11%East Coast Erosions: $25k → 11%IHE BEV: $28k → 12%Blaschack Coal: $30k → 12%Penn-Troy Manufacturing: $50k → 12%SHUMAKER INDUSTRIES: $38k → 14%CF Martin: $25k → 11%FM BROWN: $25k → 11%PDQ Printing: $25k → 13%MARTZ: $31k → 14%PRECISION MEDICAL: $36k → 11%REITNOUER: $25k → 11%GENTEX: $25k → 13%Material Solution Services: $35k → 11%NAZARETH PALLET: $28k → 11%Wacker Chemical: $25k → 11%SILBERLINE MANUFACTURING: $25k → 12%InterMetro Industries: $25k → 15%PRECISION MEDICAL: $25k → 11%Bio Med Sciences: $25k → 11%NOBLE BIOMATERIALS: $25k → 13%Lamtec: $44k → 11%POWERRAIL: $25k → 15%PMA-13: $48k → 11%ROLLING ROCK BUILDING STONE INC: $25k → 11%DYNALENE: $26k → 11%Sumitomo Cryogenics: $25k → 11%VASTEX: $35k → 11%HEYCO: $38k → 11%Simplex Homes: $35k → 13%BRD NOISE AND VIBRATIONS: $25k → 11%MISCO PRODUCTS: $35k → 11%HEYCO: $31k → 11%BRD NOISE AND VIBRATIONS: $25k → 11%BEARING AND DRIVE: $29k → 11%JED Pool Tools: $39k → 13%Fragrance Manufacturing: $32k → 11%UNITED GILSONITE: $35k → 13%Fragrance Manufacturing: $28k → 11%Bosch Rexroth: $28k → 11%JED POOLS: $28k → 13%NOVA TECH AUTOMATION: $28k → 11%Solo Laboratories: $29k → 11%FOLLETT: $48k → 11%HUMAN ACTIVE TECHNOLOGY: $28k → 11%AMERICAN POLARIZERS: $33k → 11%AMERICAN CRANE AND EQUIPMENT: $28k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 74 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

74 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
42

Total granted

$3.6M
$918k

Still filing today

11%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Bucknell University
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +12%
  • S(
    SLIBCO (SCR LACK IND BLDG CO)
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +43%
  • WE
    WAYNE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +451%

Funded once

  • HC
    HB Custom Media
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • PM
    Penn-Troy Manufacturing
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • F
    FOLLETT
    one grant, 2024 · $48k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Erie Economic Development Corporation
—
2
Wayne Economic Development Corporation

The corporation was formed to lessen the burdens of government and act in the public interest; to facilitate economic activities throughout wayne county, ny including the location and expansion of civic, industrial and commercial…

Community Improvement
3
Lawrence County Industrial Development Council

To promote business development within lawrence county, illinois.

—
4
Economic Development Company of Lancaster County

Enhance the economic well-being of lancaster county by bringing together business resources, capital and government for selective, measurable and sustainable growth.

—
5
Delaware County Economic Development Commission

Industry expansion in delaware county

—
6
Franklin County Economic Development Corporation

The edc is committed to serving new and existing businesses and industries, and to assist with the creation and retention of quality jobs through direct and collaborative funding of projects for the economic well being of franklin county.

Community Improvement
7
Erie County Economic Development Charitable Fund

To facilitate both the creation and retention of jobs within erie county and increase economic opportunities for individuals and businesses through comprehensive economic development programs.

—
8
Allegheny Conference On Community Development

See schedule othe allegheny conference on community development (accd) and affiliates - the greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (chamber), the pennsylvania economy league of greater pittsburgh(pelgp) and the pittsburgh regional alliance…

—
9
Lancaster County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Support member businesses through education and promotion, and support the quality of life in lancaster county through promoting compatible economic development.

Community Improvement
10
Worthington Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote/improve business and stimulate growth

—
11
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
12
Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation (Lvedc)

The mission of the lehigh valley economic development corporation is to market the economic assets of the lehigh valley and to create partnerships to support the recruitment, growth and retention of employers, and the creation of jobs for…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allentown Economic Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Alvernia University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEYCO: $188,250 · Other+116 more: $4,345,067 · Other+116 moreBucknell University: $45,000 · EducationCARB CENTER FOR SMALL BUSINESS TECHCTR BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER INC: $22,500 · Community ImprovementALLENTOWN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $22,500 · Community ImprovementTHE GREATER WILKES-BARRE CHAMBER OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY: $22,500 · Employment
Other$4,533,317Education$45,000Community Improvement$45,000Employment$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBucknell University: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSLIBCO (SCR LACK IND BLDG CO): $45,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWAYNE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $22,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCARB CENTER FOR SMALL BUSINESS TECHCTR BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER INC: $22,500 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetTHE GREATER WILKES-BARRE CHAMBER OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY: $22,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER HAZLETON COMMUNITY AREA NEW DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALVERNIA UNIVERSITY: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLENTOWN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bucknell University ↗
  • Who funds SLIBCO (SCR LACK IND BLDG CO) ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ben Franklin Technology Partners Ne Pa funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ben Franklin Technology Partners Ne Pa. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ben Franklin Technology Partners Ne Pa?

    Find your warmest path to Ben Franklin Technology Partners Ne Pa through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ben Franklin Technology Partners Ne Pa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph