Skip to content

· Private foundation

Belcan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
May We Help$5,000
Get WiT IT$3,000
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Foundation$3,000
Robotics Institute of Maine$2,500
University of Kentucky$2,000
Girl Scouts of Connecticut$1,500
Willington Board of Education$1,500
East Granby Board of Education$1,500
Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District$1,000
Newtons Attic$1,000
Society of Women Engineers$1,000
County of Maricopa Gilbert Public Schools$1,000
University of Kentucky - Agency and Instrumentality of the Commonwealth of$500
Rockford MakerSpace Inc FLYT 2290$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Newtons Attic: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
OH
CT
KY
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Kentucky: $2,000 · OtherUniversity of KentuckyEast Granby Board of Education: $1,500 · OtherEast Granby Board of EducationWillington Board of Education: $1,500 · OtherWillington Board of EducationGirl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: $1,500 · OtherGirl Scouts of Connecticut IncCounty of Maricopa Gilbert Public Schools: $1,000 · OtherCounty of Maricopa Gilbert Public SchoolsLoxahatchee River Environmental Control District: $1,000 · OtherLoxahatchee River Environmental Control Distric…SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $1,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERSUniversity of Kentucky - Agency and Instrumentality of the Commonwealth of: $500 · OtherRockford MakerSpace Inc FLYT 2290: $500 · OtherGETWITIT INC: $3,000 · EducationGETWITIT INCTHE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · EducationTHE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUM…Robotics Institute of Maine: $2,500 · EducationRobotics Institute of MaineMAY WE HELP INC: $5,000 · HealthMAY WE HELP INCNewton's Attic Inc: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$10,500Education$8,500Health$5,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAY WE HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds GETWITIT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Robotics Institute of Maine ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc ↗
  • Who funds Newton's Attic Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Belcan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Belcan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Belcan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Belcan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Belcan’s filings →

More from the funding graph