· Public charity
Behavioral Health Professionals Inc
Our mission is to bring our experience, spirit, and professional skills as a premier healthcare delivery system to improve our communities and the health and welfare of the people we serve.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC | $125,000 |
| HEGIRA PROGRAMS INC | $125,000 |
| THE GUIDANCE CENTER | $125,000 |
| CHILDREN'S CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY | $125,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- DCDEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue +3%
- TGTHE GUIDANCE CENTER2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue +56%
- HHHEGIRA HEALTH INC2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- NCNEW CENTER COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICESone grant, 2017 · $125k
- SCSOUTHWEST COUNSELING SOLUTIONSone grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue -13%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Behavioral Health Professionals Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Behavioral Health Professionals Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Behavioral Health Professionals Inc?
Find your warmest path to Behavioral Health Professionals Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Behavioral Health Professionals’ filings →