Skip to content
Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation

To: 1) relieve the poor,distressed & disadvantaged, 2) administer scholarships and 3)

$647k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$143k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.5MHealth$101kHuman Services$92kEducation$45kPhilanthropy$23kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$2kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 28 grants below total $496,201, the rows itemized in this filing. The $646,588 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $150,387 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $198k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$146k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF BKLYN$143,000
EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$55,200
Individual grant recipient$26,000
ADIREI HATORAH$26,000
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$25,000
BARKAI YESHIVA$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIKDASH SHAUL$21,500
YESHIVA YDE YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES$19,000
RABBI ELI MANSOUR THE EDMOND J$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
SEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION$10,501
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$10,000
BIRKEI YOSSEF YESHIVA$10,000
HILLEL YESHIVA$10,000
CONGREGATION ARAM SOBA INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $500 → 16%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $5k → 20%ATIME: $35k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $7k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $6k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $6k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $1k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $900 → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $1k → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $501 → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 40 repeat orgs$749k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
85

Total granted

$1.0M
$488k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+23%

Still filing today

28%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $261k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    Yeshivat Lev Torah
    6× · 2018–2025 · $85k · revenue +166%
  • OH
    OR HACHAYIM INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +106%
  • BF
    BARKAI FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CY
    CONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHE
    one grant, 2024 · $56k
  • JC
    JERUSALEM CENTER FOR RESEARCH
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
  • AT
    A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchangegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +228%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
9
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
11
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
12
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Friendship Circle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/36
Grantees still filing
22/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF BKLYN: $143,000 · OtherA TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF BKLYNTHE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INC: $105,501 · OtherTHE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INCEDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE: $103,190 · OtherEDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUEYESHIVA YDE (YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC): $97,000 · OtherYESHIVA YDE (YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC)YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $88,000 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHCONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHE: $56,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherOR HACHAYIM INC: $48,600 · Other+102 more: $675,402 · Other+102 moreYeshivat Lev Torah: $85,400 · ReligionYeshivat Lev…REAL CLEAR DAF INC: $30,000 · ReligionREAL CLEAR D…American Friends of Mikdash Shaul I: $23,000 · ReligionAmerican Fri…TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $18,360 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZED…YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $15,501 · ReligionYESHIVAT DAR…Tal Orot Inc: $12,200 · ReligionTal Orot IncMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $10,000 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $7,494 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $12,700 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $10,400 · EducationYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $2,800 · EducationA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $35,000 · Human ServicesWE LOVE TO HELP: $20,902 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,501 · Human ServicesGIRLS TOWN OR CHADASH: $37,001 · International+1 more: $1,002 · InternationalNew York Cancer Center Inc: $15,000 · HealthSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC: $5,200 · HealthSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $5,200 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $22,850 · Philanthropy+1 more: $560 · Philanthropy
Other$1,368,693Religion$203,955Education$90,900Human Services$63,403International$38,003Health$25,400Philanthropy$23,410

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $85,400 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOR HACHAYIM INC: $48,600 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS TOWN OR CHADASH: $37,001 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $35,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREAL CLEAR DAF INC: $30,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Mikdash Shaul I: $23,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $22,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWE LOVE TO HELP: $20,902 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $18,360 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $15,501 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $12,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTal Orot Inc: $12,200 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $10,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBIRKEI YOSSEF YESHIVA: $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZOHAR: $9,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $7,494 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAHAVAS CHAYA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOV VACHESED INC: $1,002 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFriends Of Arachim Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗
  • Who funds OR HACHAYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS TOWN OR CHADASH ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REAL CLEAR DAF INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Mikdash Shaul I ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds WE LOVE TO HELP ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC ↗
  • Who funds Tal Orot Inc ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Madeb Family Foun…The Amin and Lillian …The Howard Hoffman & …The Setton FoundationCabasso Family Founda…The Jimmy and Berta K…Jewish Communal FundE R G FoundationThe Foop FoundationJack D Cohen Foundati…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY70.8× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Madeb Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · E R G Foundation · The Foop Foundation · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beer Miriam’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home