· Public charity
Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation
To: 1) relieve the poor,distressed & disadvantaged, 2) administer scholarships and 3)
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $496,201 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $646,588 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $150,387 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $230k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $198k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF BKLYN | $143,000 |
| EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE | $55,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $26,000 |
| ADIREI HATORAH | $26,000 |
| YESHIVA UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| BARKAI YESHIVA | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIKDASH SHAUL | $21,500 |
| YESHIVA YDE YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES | $19,000 |
| RABBI ELI MANSOUR THE EDMOND J | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| SEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION | $10,501 |
| JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND | $10,000 |
| BIRKEI YOSSEF YESHIVA | $10,000 |
| HILLEL YESHIVA | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION ARAM SOBA INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $261k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YLYeshivat Lev Torah6× · 2018–2025 · $85k · revenue +166%
- OHOR HACHAYIM INC6× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +106%
- BFBARKAI FOUNDATION INC2× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- CYCONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHEone grant, 2024 · $56k
- JCJERUSALEM CENTER FOR RESEARCHone grant, 2023 · $38k
- ATA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchangegraduatedone grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +228%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
Religious School
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Friendship Circle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗
- Who funds OR HACHAYIM INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS TOWN OR CHADASH ↗
- Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
- Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REAL CLEAR DAF INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Mikdash Shaul I ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
- Who funds WE LOVE TO HELP ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
- Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC ↗
- Who funds Tal Orot Inc ↗
- Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Madeb Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · E R G Foundation · The Foop Foundation · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Beer Miriam Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.