Skip to content
Beautiful Jade Education Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Beautiful Jade Education Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$423
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$303
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3kPhilanthropy$423Arts & Culture$384Health$200International$120Religion$50Food & Nutrition$20Environment$20
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$80
Median grant
2
States reached
$145k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GoFundMeorg$303
Doctors Without Borders$80
UNICEF USA$40
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tao Fellowship: $50 → 14%American Online Giving Foundation I: $120 → 10%Golden State Youth Orchestra GSYO: $250 → 8%Amador Valley High School: $1k → 10%CCH Foundation USA: $50 → 10%GoFundMeorg: $303 → 14%UNICEF USA: $40 → 17%Pleasanton Unified School District: $455 → 10%The Ocean Cleanup: $20 → 10%Doctors Without Borders: $80 → 17%Harvest Park Middle School: $218 → 10%Pleasanton Partnerships in Educatio: $200 → 10%Amador Valley High School: $178 → 10%Alan Hu Foundation: $150 → 10%Pleasanton Partnerships in Educatio: $150 → 10%Amador Friends of Music: $134 → 10%Harvest Park Middle School: $85 → 10%Pleasanton Unified School District: $75 → 10%Harvest Park Middle School: $70 → 10%Pleasanton Unified School District: $40 → 10%Alisal PTA: $33 → 10%Amador Valley High School: $28 → 10%Open Heart Kitchen: $20 → 10%Alisal PTA: $20 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3k · 5 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$3k
$674

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+62%

Still filing today

60%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $423 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’25
HealthPhilanthropyInternationalEducationReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HARVEST PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL PTSA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $373 · revenue +16%
  • PP
    PLEASANTON PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $350 · revenue +35%
  • PC
    PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS ALISAL ELEMENTARY PTA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $53 · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • GS
    Golden State Youth Orchestra GSYO
    one grant, 2022 · $250
  • AH
    ALAN HU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $150 · revenue -24%
  • AF
    AMADOR FRIENDS OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2022 · $134 · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alameda Education Foundation

AEF serves as a critical bridge toward equitable and inclusive educational outcomes for Alameda TK-12 public school students.

—
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
Us - China Policy Foundation
—
4
Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Our vision is to reimagine everyday giving to help charities. our mission is to enable the world's leading online platforms to create opportunities for everyday charitable giving. in doing so, we ensure our programs are trustworthy,…

Philanthropy
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Pta California Congress of Pta Alvarado School

The mission of the California State PTA is to positively impact the lives of all children and families by representing our members and empowering and supporting them with skills in advocacy, leadership and communication.

—
7
Partners of the Americas Foundation

To advance the social economic well being of the americas.

International
8
California Foundation on the Environment & the Economy

The mission of the California Foundation on the Environment and the Economy is to convene broad roundtable dialogues in the areas of energy, water, transportation, telecommunications and technology, housing, and circular economy. Our…

Environment
9
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
—
10
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
11
The American Fund for Charities

Our mission is to connect caring people with great causes worldwide.

—
12
OpenAI Foundation fka OpenAI Inc

OpenAIs mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Online Giving Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cch Foundation Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Amador Valley High School: $1,206 · OtherAmador Valley High SchoolPleasanton SD: $570 · OtherPleasanton SDHARVEST PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL PTSA: $373 · OtherHARVEST PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL PTSAGolden State Youth Orchestra GSYO: $250 · OtherGolden State Youth Orchestra GSYO+2 more: $73 · OtherGOFUNDMEORG: $303 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORGAMADOR FRIENDS OF MUSIC: $134 · PhilanthropyAMADOR FRIENDS O…AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $120 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE …PLEASANTON PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $350 · EducationPLEASANTON…ALAN HU FOUNDATION: $150 · HealthCCH FOUNDATION USA: $50 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $80 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $40 · InternationalTao Fellowship: $50 · ReligionOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $20 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,472Philanthropy$557Education$350Health$200International$120Religion$50Food & Nutrition$20

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLEASANTON PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $303 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAN HU FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMADOR FRIENDS OF MUSIC: $134 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS ALISAL ELEMENTARY PTA: $53 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCCH FOUNDATION USA: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aida Miller FoundationThree Valleys Communi…United Way WorldwideAmerican Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Aida Miller FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aida Miller Foundation · Three Valleys Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beautiful Jade Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beautiful Jade Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beautiful Jade Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home