Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bean Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$23kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$4kEducation$4kHealth$3kArts & Culture$1kAnimals$900Youth Development$900Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTAH FOOD BANK$6,500
LANTERN HOUSE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $550 → 8%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $350 → 8%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $300 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 14 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$42k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    4× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +53%
  • SA
    ST ANNE'S CENTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +10%
  • PH
    PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • OO
    ONSTAGE OGDENgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +41%
  • PC
    PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $250
  • WT
    WARM THE SOULS OF KIDS
    one grant, 2019 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
4
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
5
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
6
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
8
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
9
Lightspark Foundation
Civil Rights
10
Bike Utah

Bike utah is the statewide, nonprofit bicycle advocacy and education organization. our mission is to make utah a better place to ride, and we envision a utah where complete active transportation networks and thriving cycling culture…

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Utah Symphony & Opera

Mission - Connect the community through great live music. Vision - Perform, engage, inspire. The artistic leadership of the organization is committed to representing a broad range of musical styles, including traditional works,…

Arts & Culture
12
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercury One Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bonneville Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH FOOD BANK: $22,900 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKST ANNE'S CENTER: $4,100 · OtherST ANNE'S CENTERUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWILD LIFE REHAB CENTER: $1,500 · OtherLANTERN HOUSE ST ANNE'S CENTER: $1,400 · Other+9 more: $3,640 · Other+9 morePEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $1,200 · Human ServicesBUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD: $900 · InternationalMercury One Inc: $200 · InternationalHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,050 · HealthWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF NORTHERN UTAH: $900 · AnimalsKostopulos Dream Foundation: $500 · Recreation & SportsBONNEVILLE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$39,540Human Services$1,200International$1,100Health$1,050Animals$900Recreation & Sports$500Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $22,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $4,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $1,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONSTAGE OGDEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD: $900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF NORTHERN UTAH: $900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKostopulos Dream Foundation: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercury One Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY MUSIC ALLIANCE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEBER FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 1: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONSTAGE OGDEN ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING YOUTH AROUND THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF NORTHERN UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Kostopulos Dream Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY MUSIC ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BONNEVILLE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEBER FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 1 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bean Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bean Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bean Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bean Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bean Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph