Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bc Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$190k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$158kFood & Nutrition$125kEducation$60kInternational$50kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$25kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $185k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$380k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$35,000
YOLO FOOD BANK$35,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$30,000
PSI$20,000
PER SCHOLAS$15,000
SEVA FOUNDATION$15,000
CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF RICHMAND$15,000
STEAC$10,000
DONOR CHOOSE$10,000
EMPOWER YOLO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EMPOWER YOLO: $5k → 16%EMPOWER YOLO: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$328k · 9 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$328k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-5%

Still filing today

78%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $88k · revenue +43%
  • CM
    Children's Museum of Richmond
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +85%
  • KF
    KIPP FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • T
    TPIRC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Valley Vision

Valley vision is a civic leadership organization dedicated to improving the livability of the sacramento region. through research and action, we collaborate on bold, long-term solutions that improve people's lives.

Community Improvement
4
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kipp Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PSI: $55,000 · OtherPSIIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTEAC: $15,000 · OtherSTEACIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTPIRC: $15,000 · OtherTPIRCTPRIC: $15,000 · OtherTPRICPER SCHOLAS: $15,000 · OtherPER SCHOLASDONOR CHOOSE: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $87,500 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDA…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED IN…YOLO FOOD BANK: $65,000 · Food & NutritionYOLO FOOD BANKFEED MORE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFEED MORE INCSEVA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · InternationalSEVA FOUNDAT…Children's Museum of Richmond: $25,000 · Arts & CultureKIPP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationEmpower Yolo Inc: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$205,000Health$92,500Food & Nutrition$75,000International$50,000Arts & Culture$25,000Education$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $87,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK: $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Museum of Richmond: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmpower Yolo Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Museum of Richmond ↗
  • Who funds KIPP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds Empower Yolo Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bc Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bc Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bc Campbell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph