Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barre Savings Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$137kRecreation & Sports$81kArts & Culture$81kHealth$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kHuman Services$46kFood & Nutrition$34kEnvironment$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Barre Food Pantry$15,900
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Montachusett Veterans Outreach Ctr$7,800
Barre Historical Society$7,000
Quabbin Area Little League$6,000
Dismas House$5,000
Friends of Fobes Memorial Library$5,000
Friends of the Stone Church Inc$5,000
Paige Memorial Library$4,645
Quabbin RSD Oakham Center School$4,500
Town of Barre Library$4,300
Camp Putnam$4,300
Hardwick Community Fair Associatio$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Bay State Equine Rescue Inc: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$484k · 31 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
35

Total granted

$484k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+11%

Still filing today

32%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BARRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +128% · 47% of their budget
  • CP
    CAMP PUTNAM INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +184%
  • BL
    BARRE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $31k · revenue +139% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • QQ
    QDrug Quabbin Regional SchDist
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • FF
    Felton Field Commission
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • UM
    UMASS Mem office of Philanthropy
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
2
Barnstable Historical Society

To foster interest in the history of barnstable, massachusetts

Arts & Culture
3
Barnstable Land Trust Inc

Preservation of undeveloped land in the town of barnstable and nearby areas

Environment
4
Bourne Conservation Trust

To provide the general public with woodland trails through a wildlife sanctuary in a natural state for their appreciation and enjoyment

Environment
5
New Marlborough Land Trust Inc

Land preservation

—
6
North County Land Trust Inc

We connect people to natural places by protecting open land and creating outdoor experiences in north central massachusetts.

Environment
7
Massachusetts Land Conservation Trust

Conservation and preservation of land.

Environment
8
Brewster Conservation Trust

Land conservation

Environment
9
Freetown Historical Society Inc

To acquire and preserve for posterity, the artifacts and history of the town of freetown, massachusetts.

Arts & Culture
10
Wellfleet Historical Society Inc

Education and preservation of wellfleet historical buildings and artifacts in wellfleet, ma.

—
11
Westborough Historical Society

To study, educate, collect and preserve historical records and artifacts for the town of Westborough, MA

—
12
West Stockbridge Historical Society

The mission of the west stockbridge historical society is to preserve the history and culture of west stockbridge, ma through research, programming, community involvment and the restoration of the old town hall.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barre Historical Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $81,376 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBARRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $49,500 · OtherBARRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCQuabbin Regional School District: $28,700 · OtherQuabbin Regional School DistrictFriends of Fobes Memorial Library: $25,500 · Other+60 more: $335,791 · Other+60 moreBARRE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $30,500 · EducationMount Wachusett Community College Foundation Inc: $10,000 · EducationNO 4 SCHOOLHOUSE INC: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCAMP PUTNAM INC: $32,800 · Recreation & SportsDISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $23,000 · Crime & LegalMONTACHUSETT VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER I: $20,300 · Public BenefitFRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH: $10,000 · ReligionEAST QUABBIN LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 · Environment
Other$520,867Education$44,500Recreation & Sports$32,800Crime & Legal$23,000Public Benefit$20,300Religion$10,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $49,500 over 4y, 47% of budgetCAMP PUTNAM INC: $32,800 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetBARRE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $30,500 over 6y, 32% of budgetDISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMONTACHUSETT VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER I: $20,300 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJO'S JACKETS: $15,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetMount Wachusett Community College Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH: $10,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetEAST QUABBIN LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPOLUS CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VANESSA T MARCOTTE FOUNDATION - NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHEART OF NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL BSA INC: $4,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNO 4 SCHOOLHOUSE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 90% of budgetBAY STATE EQUINE RESCUE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetGeorge P Gibbs Jr Little League: $2,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetJOE'S JOURNEY FOR RECOVERY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetTURN BACK TIME INC: $1,248 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARRE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP PUTNAM INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DISMAS HOUSE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTACHUSETT VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER I ↗
  • Who funds JO'S JACKETS ↗
  • Who funds Mount Wachusett Community College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE STONE CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds EAST QUABBIN LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHINE INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds POLUS CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VANESSA T MARCOTTE FOUNDATION - NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Worcester Community Foundation IncMA19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Fleming Family Foundation · Reliant Foundation Inc · Woosox Foundation Inc · Schwartz Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of North Central Ma · AbbVie Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barre Savings Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barre Savings Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Montachusett Veterans Outreach Center I: 17% of income from government
  • East Quabbin Land Trust Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Friends of the Stone Church: 2% of income from government
  • Turn Back Time Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Barre Savings Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Barre Savings Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barre Savings’ filings →

More from the funding graph