Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Banfield Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$64kHuman Services$23kEducation$23kYouth Development$18kFood & Nutrition$14kAnimals$6kReligion$6kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$224k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE IWD CARNEGIE LIBRARY$4,000
PJ ODONNELL CIVIC CENTER$4,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$3,400
SALEMZION KIDS CLUBCAMP$2,000
AWKWARD STAGE DRAMA CLUB$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
IRONWOOD THEATRE$1,000
ERWIN TOWNSHIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE DOVE INC$1,000
HOPE ANIMAL SHELTER$500
SAINT MAUDS$500
HURLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY$500
WAKEFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY$500
ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE (DOVE) INC: $2k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE DOVE INC: $2k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE DOVE INC: $2k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE DOVE INC: $1k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE DOVE INC: $1k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE DOVE INC: $1k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE DOVE INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$142k · 22 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -87% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$142k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-87%

Still filing today

27%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IT
    IRONWOOD THEATRE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +256%
  • ID
    Ironwood Downtown Art Place Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +10%
  • DV
    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • SL
    SALEMZION LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • GC
    GOGEBIC COMM COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iron County Historical Society Inc

Preserve and advance knowledge of the history of the area

2
Fridley Historical Society

Historical Education

3
Lake County Historical Society

Historical museum

4
Washburn Historical Museum and Cultural Arts Center Inc
Arts & Culture
5
The Ironwood Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Moody County Historical Society

County museum

7
Ely Winton Historical Society

Discovery, preservation and dissemination of knowledge of the history of the Ely area

8
Vilas County Museum & Historical Society Inc

Education and Preservation

9
Waynoka Historical Society

Preserving waynoka railroad depot

Arts & Culture
10
Morgan County Genealogical and Hist
Arts & Culture
11
Elk County Historical Society

To collect, preserve and display items of historical significance to elk county.

12
Ilwaco Heritage Foundation Columbia Pacific Heritage Museum

The collection, preservation, interpretation and display of artifacts native to the area for the benefit and enrichment of the local residents and visitors to the area. Yearly visitation is approximately ten thousand.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ironwood Theatre Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wakefield Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST VINCENT DE PAUL — $17,400 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULIRONWOOD CARNEGIE LIBRARY — $13,500 · OtherIRONWOOD CARNEGIE LIBRARYSALEMZION KIDS CLUB — $11,200 · OtherSALEMZION KIDS CLUBIronwood Downtown Art Place Inc — $11,100 · OtherIronwood Downtown Art Place IncIRONWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $8,500 · OtherIRONWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherHOPE ANIMAL SHELTER — $5,809 · OtherCARNEGIE LIBRARY — $5,000 · Other+20 more — $39,600 · Other+20 moreIRONWOOD THEATRE INC — $14,400 · Arts & CultureIRONWOOD THEA…Erwin Township Historical Society — $4,000 · Arts & CultureErwin Townshi…+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureDOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE INC (DOVE) — $10,000 · Human ServicesHURLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationSaint Mauds Corporation — $500 · EducationGOGEBIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $100 · EducationIron County Food Pantry — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$132,109Arts & Culture$18,900Human Services$10,000Education$2,600Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIRONWOOD THEATRE INC — $14,400 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetIronwood Downtown Art Place Inc — $11,100 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE INC (DOVE) — $10,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetErwin Township Historical Society — $4,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetHURLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetIron County Food Pantry — $1,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSaint Mauds Corporation — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWAKEFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOGEBIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IRONWOOD THEATRE INC
  • Who funds Ironwood Downtown Art Place Inc
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ESCAPE INC (DOVE)
  • Who funds Erwin Township Historical Society
  • Who funds HURLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Iron County Food Pantry
  • Who funds Saint Mauds Corporation
  • Who funds WAKEFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds GOGEBIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Banfield Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Banfield Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Banfield Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph