Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bally's Foundation North America Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$290k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE INSTITUTE FOR NONVIOLENCE - CHICAGO$100,000
FENCING IN THE PARK$50,000
THE FELIX PROJECT$50,000
HOPE EXISTS FOUNDATION$50,000
EDUCATION EQUITY FUND$30,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving83% of grant dollars ($240k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($50k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $10k → 17%FENCING IN THE PARK: $50k → 20%EDUCATION EQUITY FUND: $30k → 14%HOPE EXISTS FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%THE INSTITUTE FOR NONVIOLENCE - CHICAGO: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US17% of all-years giving ($50k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$50k · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Institute for Nonviolence Chicago — $100,000 · Crime & LegalInstitute for Nonviolence ChicagoHOPE EXISTS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Crime & LegalHOPE EXISTS FOUNDATION INCFENCING IN THE PARK INC — $50,000 · OtherFENCING IN THE PARK INCTHE FELIX PROJECT — $50,000 · OtherTHE FELIX PROJECTEDUCATION EQUITY FUND — $30,000 · OtherEDUCATION EQUITY FUNDNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $10,000 · Health
Crime & Legal$150,000Other$130,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInstitute for Nonviolence Chicago — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFENCING IN THE PARK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetHOPE EXISTS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bally's Foundation North America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 60%
  • Hope Exists Foundation Inc60% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bally's Foundation North America Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bally's Foundation North America Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph