Skip to content

· Private foundation

Baker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$329k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$298k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.6MHuman Services$81kEducation$39kArts & Culture$24kHealth$16kCrime & Legal$10kCommunity Improvement$10kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+1 grant · $298k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVANCEMENT FNDTN CATH DIOCESE FT W$297,877
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$25,000
EQ ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE$3,600
AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HIKE FOR LIFE INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
CT
CA
KY
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
14

Total granted

$1.4M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+97%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $298k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +97%
  • TD
    THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE
    3× · 2017–2023 · $28k · revenue +38%
  • BC
    Benedictine College
    2× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CTR JOHNSON COU
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FORT WORTH
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • NC
    NORTHEAST CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miracles From Heaven
International
2
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
3
Diocese of California American Catholic Church

Exaltation of god evangelization of the world

Religion
4
Keep the Faith Inc

Keep the faith is a catholic lay apostolate devoted to assist in the dissemanation of good catholic doctrine

Religion
5
Life As Mission
Unclassified
6
American Catholic Press

American catholic press exists to promote the good of the liturgy, academic research and instruction, especially in liturgical and theological studies and the spread of christion culture, especially hymns and other liturgical music.

—
7
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
8
Desales University

Desales is a catholic, salesian university that inspires transformative learning through the liberal arts and professional studies by energizing students to be who they are and be that well.

Education
9
Inter-America Mission
—
10
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
11
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
12
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission 500 Inc; the most unlike its peers is Northern California Dx Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST STEPHEN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1,119,345 · OtherST STEPHEN'S CATHOLIC CHURCHADVANCEMENT FNDTN CATH DIOCESE FT W: $297,877 · OtherADVANCEMENT FNDTN CATH DIOCESE FT WTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $68,000 · Other+22 more: $242,452 · Other+22 moreTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $28,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 · ReligionTHE AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureBenedictine College: $10,000 · EducationHIKE FOR LIFE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMISSION 500 INC: $250 · Human ServicesCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $500 · Health
Other$1,727,674Religion$30,500Arts & Culture$22,500Education$10,000Human Services$5,250Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $68,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA DX FOUNDATION: $9,750 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetHIKE FOR LIFE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION 500 INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA DX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIKE FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MISSION 500 INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baker Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baker Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baker Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph