Skip to content
Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$241k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$307kHuman Services$14kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$4kArts & Culture$3kEducation$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHEL SHLOMO DOV$57,470
Individual grant recipient$45,826
Individual grant recipient$45,222
CONG AHAVAS TORAH V'CHSED$21,453
CONG AHAVAS CHESED$17,445
MOSDOS BOTOSHAN$13,250
Individual grant recipient$13,100
Individual grant recipient$8,580
Individual grant recipient$7,620
CONG SIMCHAS AHARON$3,000
CONG CHAZON YESHAYA$1,500
CONG BAIS AHARON$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KEREN ASHER: $51k → 13%DAEMEN COLLEGE: $2k → 13%AVRAHAM ERPS: $5k → 14%CONG HEICHAL SHAYA: $13k → 16%CONG CHAZON YESHAYA: $5k → 11%KEREN ASHER: $46k → 13%CONG SIMCHAS AHARON: $3k → 20%CONG CHAZON YESHAYA: $5k → 11%KEREN ASHER: $4k → 13%CONG MACHZEKEI HADAS: $3k → 11%KEREN ASHER: $2k → 13%CONG TORAH VACHESED: $2k → 11%CONG KHAL DVAR SHMIEL: $23k → 20%CONG KHAL DVAR SHMIEL: $8k → 20%CONG CHASUDIM TOVIM: $8k → 20%KEREN HAGEMACH: $3k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BERDITCHOV: $3k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BERDITCHOV: $2k → 20%CONG AHAVAS CHESED: $17k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED: $25k → 20%CONG CHEMDAS SHLOMO: $4k → 20%CHEN V'CHESED V'RACHAMIM: $10k → 20%ZICHRON YISROEL DOVID: $3k → 20%ZICHRON YISROEL DOVID: $3k → 20%VARIOUS INDIVIDUALS: $116k → 20%OHEL SHLOMO DOV: $57k → 20%CONG HAMAIR LAOLAM: $45k → 20%VARIOUS: $29k → 20%CONG HAMAIR LAOLAM: $20k → 20%CONG WOSIKIN: $16k → 20%MOSDOS BOTOSHAN: $13k → 20%CONG ACHARIS HAYOMIM: $9k → 20%MOSDOS SATMAR: $6k → 20%CONG WOSIKIN MAMEZUNIM: $5k → 20%MOSHE EISECOVITZ: $4k → 20%MISCELLANEOUS: $4k → 20%BAIS BROCHO OF KARLIN STOLIN: $4k → 20%CONG ANSHE 1420: $4k → 20%CONG NACHLAS MOSHE: $3k → 20%MISCELLANEOUS: $3k → 20%MISCELLANEOUS: $3k → 20%MOSDOS SATMAR: $2k → 20%ARI GOLDMAN: $2k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TORAH V'CHSED: $23k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TORAH V'CHSED: $21k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TORAH V'CHSED: $21k → 20%CONG TOLDOS YEHUDA: $11k → 20%ESTHER HOROWITZ: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$366k · 23 repeat orgs$341k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
36

Total granted

$366k
$214k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+28%

Still filing today

4%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2024 · $103k
  • CA
    CONG AHAVAS TORAH V'CHSED
    3× · 2022–2024 · $66k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $65k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $116k
  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2018 · $29k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $115,905 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $102,966 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONG AHAVAS TORAH V'CHSED: $66,100 · OtherCONG AHAVAS TORAH V'CHSEDIndividual grant recipient: $65,322 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOHEL SHOLMO DOV: $57,470 · OtherOHEL SHOLMO DOVCONG KHAL DVAR SHMIEL: $31,450 · OtherVARIOUS: $29,222 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $25,821 · Other+61 more: $199,088 · Other+61 moreChen Vchesed Vrachamim Inc: $9,615 · Health+1 more: $150 · HealthDAEMEN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationTORAS IMECHA INC: $300 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $1,336 · Religion
Other$693,344Health$9,765Education$2,300Religion$1,336

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChen Vchesed Vrachamim Inc: $9,615 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDAEMEN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $1,336 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS IMECHA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAZKEINU: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chen Vchesed Vrachamim Inc ↗
  • Who funds DAEMEN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Meh Family Foundation…Cohen Ld Family Found…Tyrnauer Family Found…The R & S Family Foun…B&M Steinmetz Foundat…Moses and Miriam Voge…Hf FoundationRegina Goldwasser Fou…Chayim V ChesedThe Jimmy and Berta K…
The Ojc FundNY36.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Meh Family Foundation Inc · Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc · Tyrnauer Family Foundation · The R & S Family Foundation Inc · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · Hf Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Chayim V Chesed · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Toras Imecha Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home