· Private foundation
Baer Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE DALTON SCHOOL | $60,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.
13 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ACARTS CENTER IN ORANGE INC6× · 2017–2022 · $47k · revenue +21%
- OFOrange Free Clinic Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +79%
- RVRapidan Volunteer Fire Department6× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- TBTHE BARTELS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +631%
- VTVIRGINIA TECHone grant, 2022 · $8k
- LULONGWOOD UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides fire protection services for orange county indiana.
To provide fire services to the town of orange
Provide volunteer fire protection and other emergency services for the community.
The organization is an all-volunteer fire department serving the counties of orange and louisa, va. its purpose is to provide emergency services to the businesses and residences of orange and louisa, va.
The mission of the oceana fire association is to serve the community of oceana by dispelling fires and the protection of person and property.
Non profit volunteer fire department for the city of vienna, wv and surrounding areas. committed to educating communities about fire and safety.
Providing legal services to needy persons
Provide fire fighting services to the residents of dennis township
To provide volunteer emergency fire and rescue services to fauquier, culpeper and rappahannock counties.
Providing fire protection to the residents of oakland, md and surrounding areas.
The Orange Public Library Foundation is a non-profit organization raising money to support and enhance Orange public library facilities services programs and technology.
To hold government agencies, elected officials and other power brokers in orange county accountable through investigative news coverage. to be catalyst in the community for a robust and sophisticated discourse on local politics and…
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DALTON SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS CENTER IN ORANGE INC ↗
- Who funds Orange Free Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BARTELS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rapidan Volunteer Fire Department ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUSIA SHERIFFS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA CIVICS EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds ORANGE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Baer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Baer’s filings →