Skip to content

· Private foundation

B4 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0163% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$11kInternational$8kFood & Nutrition$7kHuman Services$6kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kCommunity Improvement$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$355k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OYE$5,000
LIMITLESS HORIZONS$5,000
BORDER KINDNESS$2,500
FAIR FOOD PROGRAM$2,000
GIVE DIRECTLY$2,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,500
NETWORK OF INTERNATIONAL DONORS$1,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CAMINPS DE AQUA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NETWORK OF INTERNATIONAL DONORS: $2k → 16%MODURON CHILDRENS RESCUE FUND: $250 → 28%OYE: $5k → 14%FAIR FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 9%SOCCER FOR PEACE: $1k → 15%CC'S CUPBOARD: $250 → 9%ASPIRE GLOBALLY: $1k → 6%HONDURAN CHILDREN'S RESCUE: $1k → 17%CAMINPS DE AQUA: $1k → 8%ZAWADISHA FUND: $1k → 10%NETWORK OF INTERNATIONAL DONORS: $2k → 16%OYE: $4k → 14%CC'S CUPBOARD: $250 → 9%ASPIRE GLOBALLY: $1k → 6%HONDURAN CHILDREN'S RESCUE: $1k → 17%ZAWADISHA FUND: $500 → 10%OYE: $1k → 14%HONDURAN CHILDREN'S RESCUE: $1k → 17%ZAWADISHA FUND: $500 → 10%GLOBAL GIVING: $3k → 14%DRINK LOCAL TAP: $1k → 17%DRINK LOCAL TAP: $500 → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD: $5k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD: $5k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NV
OH
CA
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 13 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$59k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+21%

Still filing today

38%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue -14%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k
  • O
    OYE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k

Funded once

  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -7%
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Gifts Inc

Serving impoverished artisans and producers in the developing world by providing a fair income and employment for people of limited opportunity.

International
2
Global Dental Relief

Global Dental Relief GDR brings free dental treatment and preventive care to 23,000 children annually from remote villages charity schools and orphanages. In addition GDR provides oral health education a new toothbrush and preventive oral…

Recreation & Sports
3
One Days Wages

One Day's Wages is a movement of people, stories, and actions to alleviate extreme global poverty. One Day's Wages promotes awareness, invites giving, and supports sustainable relief through partnerships, especially with smaller…

International
4
Water for Good

Water for good's mission is to transform lives through sustainable access to safe water as well as improved sanitation and hygiene in the places that need it most.

International
5
Center for Global Development

Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…

Human Services
6
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
7
Living Goods

Living goods aims to save lives at scale by supporting digitally empowered community health workers. we work with governments and partners to leverage smart mobile technology, rigorously strengthen performance, and relentlessly innovate to…

International
8
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
9
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
10
World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International
11
The Clear Fund

Givewell is dedicated to finding and funding outstanding giving opportunities in global health and development, sharing the full details of our analysis with everyone for free.

Philanthropy
12
Keralink International Inc

Keralink international works to end avoidable blindness by developing, delivering, and scaling affordable solutions for all, powered by innovative technology and partnerships.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Globalgiving Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aspire Globally. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOYE: $9,500 · OtherOYEFAIR FOOD PROGRAM: $6,500 · OtherFAIR FOOD PROGRAMIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNETWORK OF INTERNATIONAL DONORS: $3,000 · OtherNETWORK OF INTERNATIONAL DONORSIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $2,000 · Other+5 more: $3,250 · Other+5 moreLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC: $11,000 · EducationLIMITLESS HORIZON…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVIN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…CAMINOS DE AGUA: $1,000 · InternationalCAMINOS DE …JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $4,000 · PhilanthropyBORDER KINDNESS: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE ZAWADISHA FUND: $2,000 · Community ImprovementAspire Globally: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$41,750Education$11,000International$7,000Philanthropy$4,000Housing & Shelter$4,000Community Improvement$2,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBORDER KINDNESS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ZAWADISHA FUND: $2,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAspire Globally: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCAMINOS DE AGUA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds BORDER KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ZAWADISHA FUND ↗
  • Who funds Aspire Globally ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMINOS DE AGUA ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B4 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B4 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on B4’s filings →

    More from the funding graph