Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

B'Nai B'Rith Youth Organization

Bbyo is the leading pluralistic teen movement aspiring to involve more jewish teens in more meaningful jewish experiences.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$5.8MInternational$1.5MReligion$922kHuman Services$165k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $200,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,838,357 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,638,357 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA: $54k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA: $48k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA: $29k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $23k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $1.2M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, $499k to organizations and $723k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$622k · 51% · 18 grants · 415 people

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT · SCHOLARSHIPS

Middle East and North Africa$276k · 23% · 12 grants · 70 people

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT · SCHOLARSHIPS

North America (Canada and Mexico)$171k · 14% · 4 grants · 137 people

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT · SCHOLARSHIPS

East Asia and the Pacific$68k · 6% · 5 grants · 20 people

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT · SCHOLARSHIPS

South America$37k · 3% · 51 people

Stated purpose: SCHOLARSHIPS

Russia and Neighboring States$36k · 3% · 26 people

Stated purpose: SCHOLARSHIPS

Sub-Saharan Africa$8k · 1% · 10 people

Stated purpose: SCHOLARSHIPS

Central America and the Caribbean$5k · 0% · 6 people

Stated purpose: SCHOLARSHIPS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BBYO FUND FOR THE FUTURE INC — $6,730,719 · ReligionBBYO FUND FOR THE FUTURE INCThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $1,514,620 · InternationalThe American Jewish …MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC — $164,738 · Human Services
Religion$6,730,719International$1,514,620Human Services$164,738

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBBYO FUND FOR THE FUTURE INC — $6,730,719 over 7y, 99% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $1,514,620 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC — $164,738 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization B'Nai B'Rith Youth Organization funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph