Skip to content
B B Lederer Sons Foundation Tr Dtd 10347 Wt at a glance

· Private foundation

B B Lederer Sons Foundation Tr Dtd 10347 Wt

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$95kFood & Nutrition$70kEducation$59kHousing & Shelter$45kCivil Rights$4kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$7,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER$10,000
RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$7,000
LUCY'S HEARTH$7,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF RI INC$7,000
EAST BAY FOOD PANTRY$7,000
SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC$7,000
AMOS HOUSE$7,000
DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER: $10k → 8%BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER: $10k → 8%BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER: $10k → 8%BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER: $10k → 8%BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$296k · 10 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$296k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+162%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +232%
  • SO
    SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +71%
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CITY YEAR INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +3%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +162%
  • LINCOLN SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
3
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
4
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
5
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
6
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels of Ri Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMOS HOUSE: $21,000 · OtherAMOS HOUSECITY YEAR INC: $5,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCDR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY: $4,000 · OtherDR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR C…LINCOLN SCHOOL: $2,500 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF RI INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF RI INCRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $18,000 · Food & NutritionRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FO…EAST BAY FOOD PANTRY: $17,000 · Food & NutritionEAST BAY FOOD PANTRYSCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $43,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEELS O…STEPS TO SUCCESS INC: $8,000 · EducationSTEPS TO SUCCESS I…BARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesBARRY L PRICE REHA…BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $40,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEAC…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 · HealthDana-Farber Canc…LUCY'S HEARTH: $24,000 · Housing & ShelterMARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER INCORPORATED: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$72,500Food & Nutrition$70,000Education$51,000Human Services$50,000Health$45,000Housing & Shelter$24,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $43,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF RI INC: $35,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLUCY'S HEARTH: $24,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAMOS HOUSE: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY FOOD PANTRY: $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPS TO SUCCESS INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Rhode I…The Rhode Island Comm…Citizens Charitable F…Harry M Miriam C Will…Billy Andrade-Brad Fa…Centreville Savings B…The Champlin Foundati…Eastern Bank Foundati…Boston Foundation IncThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…
United Way of Rhode Island IncRI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Rhode Island Inc · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Harry M Miriam C Will C Horton F · Billy Andrade-Brad Faxon Charities for Children Inc · Centreville Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · The Champlin Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B B Lederer Sons Foundation Tr Dtd 10347 Wt funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B B Lederer Sons Foundation Tr Dtd 10347 Wt. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Steps to Success Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on B B Lederer Sons Foundation Tr Dtd 10347 Wt’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home