Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Aziz & Razia Dharamsey Family Found

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$326k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$198k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$722kEducation$88kHuman Services$50kInternational$10kReligion$6kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $248k
$4,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHINE Humanity$197,500
Bukrah Foundation$50,000
Madina Institute$25,000
Imran Khan Cancer Appeal$20,000
American Heart Association$10,500
Human Development Foundation$10,000
Little Rock Compassion Center$4,000
Common Ground Ministrys$2,000
Islamic Center of Pine Bluff$2,000
Ronald McDonald House$1,500
Covenant House$1,114
St Jude$1,000
Neighbor to Neighbor$1,000
American Cancer Society$311
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Bukrah Foundation: $50k → 10%Covenant House: $1k → 17%Neighbor to Neighbor: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CT
CA
MD
AR
TN
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$742k · 3 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$742k
$47k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE INITIATIVES NOW EMPOWERING HUMANITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $488k · revenue +112%
  • HD
    Human Development Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $167k
  • MI
    Madina Institute
    4× · 2021–2024 · $88k

Funded once

  • IK
    Imran Khan Cancer Appeal
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • N
    NAPKO
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • ID
    IMI Dream Project
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Habib Alrahman Charity Foundation

The mission of habib alrahman charity foundation (hacf) is to establish a kideny center in sudan called hacf kidney center, which will help patients with kidney (renal)problems in sudan. kidney problems are very common in sudan and the…

Health
3
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
4
Ankur International

Assisting financially challenged patients with life threatening emergency medical conditions. It also helps building charitable healthcare clinics free schools building and running orphanages and provide scholarships to poor needy students…

International
5
Shakir Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
Aparnas Health Foundation
Philanthropy
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

10
Doctors to the World

Medical care and education to under-served communities around the world.

11
Cancer Survivors

Providing cancer survivors with a variety of solutions from diet to detoxification using natural plants and herbs, in order to maintain their health in good condition and avoid recurrences.

Human Services
12
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Imran Khan Cancer Appeal Inc and the most unlike its peers is Common Ground Ministrys. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE INITIATIVES NOW EMPOWERING HUMANITY — $487,819 · Public Safety & DisasterSUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE INITIATIVES NOW EMPOWERING HUMANITYHuman Development Foundation — $166,544 · OtherHuman Development FoundationMadina Institute — $87,500 · OtherMadina InstituteIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $20,000 · OtherIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCImran Khan Cancer Appeal — $20,000 · OtherImran Khan Cancer AppealNAPKO — $12,500 · Other+7 more — $23,000 · Other+7 moreBUKRAH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,114 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,500 · Health+1 more — $311 · HealthCommon Ground Ministrys — $2,000 · Religion
Public Safety & Disaster$487,819Other$329,544Human Services$52,114Health$10,811Religion$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE INITIATIVES NOW EMPOWERING HUMANITY — $487,819 over 5y, 20% of budgetBUKRAH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $1,114 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $311 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE INITIATIVES NOW EMPOWERING HUMANITY
  • Who funds BUKRAH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds Common Ground Ministrys
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Aziz & Razia Dharamsey Family Found funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Aziz & Razia Dharamsey Family Found?

    Find your warmest path to Aziz & Razia Dharamsey Family Found through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph