Skip to content

· Private foundation

Avigdor and Esther Mandel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$224kPhilanthropy$216kHuman Services$21kInternational$6kEducation$500Public Benefit$360Food & Nutrition$180Health$18Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $76k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$623k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTA$28,200
THE OJC FUND$22,500
KUPAS DEXTER PARK$13,000
AREIVIM USA$12,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BIKUR CHOLIM OF ROCKLAND COUNTY$1,000
CONG TOLMITCH$330
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $6k → 6%YESHIVA RAV SHALOM: $3k → 13%KUPAS DEXTER PARK: $13k → 14%CONG VYOEL MOSHE: $2k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OSEH CHAYIL: $2k → 17%Cong Vyoel Moshe: $2k → 14%CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%MESIVTA VYOEL MOSHE DSATMAR: $2k → 14%CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%UTA: $54k → 14%UTA: $48k → 14%UTA: $43k → 14%UTA: $43k → 14%UTA: $28k → 14%UTA: $26k → 14%BAIS RUCHEL: $10k → 20%UTA: $24k → 14%Kollel Avreichem Dsatmar: $2k → 20%CONG BEIS PINCHOS: $10k → 14%KOLEL AVREICHIM DSATMAR: $1k → 20%CONGREGATION OF ZWEHILL: $2k → 14%KOLEL AVREICHIM DSATMAR: $1k → 20%KOLEL AVREICHIM DSATMAR: $1k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $23k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $23k → 20%AREIVIM USA: $12k → 20%Bikur Cholim of Rockland: $8k → 14%BIKUR CHOLIM OF ROCKLAND: $8k → 14%CONGREGATION TORAH VYIRAH: $7k → 14%CONG AHAVAS YISROEL: $5k → 14%COTV: $4k → 14%CONGREGATION YETEV LEV OF MONSEY: $3k → 14%COTV: $2k → 14%Chavere Osei Tzdoko V'Chesd: $2k → 14%KHAL TORAS CHAIM: $2k → 14%CHEVRA OSEI TZEDUKAH VECHESED: $2k → 14%CONGREGATION YETEV LEV OF MONSEY: $2k → 14%COTV: $2k → 14%CHEVRA OSEI TZEDUKAH VECHESSED: $2k → 14%COTV: $2k → 14%CENTRAL UTAU OF MONSEY: $1k → 14%Cong Ezer Lyehuda Inc: $1k → 14%KEREN CHASANIM OF SAAD L TALMID INC: $1k → 14%BIKUR CHOILM OF ROCKLAND: $1k → 14%CONG VYOEL MOSHE: $1k → 14%SHINIVER CONG: $1k → 14%COTV: $1k → 14%CONG VYOEL MOSHE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$350k · 31 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
90

Total granted

$350k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+58%

Still filing today

3%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
ReligionInternationalEducationPublic BenefitFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U
    UTA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $267k
  • BC
    Bikur Cholim of Rockland
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16k
  • C
    COTV
    6× · 2017–2023 · $11k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CB
    CONG BEIS PINCHOS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TORAH VYIRAH
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Chasudim Foundation
—
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
8
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
9
The Etz Chaim Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
10
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
11
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
12
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ojc Fund; the most unlike its peers is Kupas Dexter Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTA: $266,932 · OtherUTABikur Cholim of Rockland: $15,850 · Other+114 more: $139,872 · Other+114 moreTHE OJC FUND: $45,000 · EducationTHE OJC FU…+1 more: $500 · EducationKupas Dexter Park Inc: $13,000 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OSEH CHAYIL: $1,800 · ReligionCentral Fund of Israel: $5,500 · International+1 more: $18 · InternationalTHE REISMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropyVYAZREIM INC: $360 · Public BenefitTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $180 · Food & Nutrition
Other$422,654Education$45,500Religion$20,800International$5,518Philanthropy$500Public Benefit$360Food & Nutrition$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OJC FUND: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OSEH CHAYIL: $1,800 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds Kupas Dexter Park Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OSEH CHAYIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY56.6× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Igcf Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Mk Charity Foundation Inc · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · Ani Mamin Foundation · Vyazreim Inc · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Avigdor and Esther Mandel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Avigdor and Esther Mandel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 126 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Avigdor and Esther Mandel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph