· Private foundation
Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $101k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $269k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Pegasus Farm | $35,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| Heart of Ohio Diaper Bank | $26,000 |
| Stark State College Foundation | $25,400 |
| AULTMAN COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| Viola Startzman Clinic | $20,000 |
| SAM Center Massillon | $12,523 |
| Total Living Center | $10,000 |
| Access Health Stark County Canton | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Aunt Susie's Cancer Wellness Ctr Canton | $10,000 |
| Pomerene Hospital Millersburg | $10,000 |
| En-rich-ment | $10,000 |
| Faith in Action | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBeacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc5× · 2018–2024 · $200k · revenue +109%
- PFPEGASUS FARM4× · 2018–2025 · $138k · revenue +36%
- CCCLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL2× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $50k
- SHSPRINGVALE HEALTH CENTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $37k · revenue +113%
- OLOhio's LifeCare Hospiceone grant, 2021 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes
Ending homelessness in stark county ohio.
Provide access to affordable high quality integrated care for all. Our organization offers a wide range of services, which includes comprehensive behavioral health care, dental health care, and primary health care. Hopewell Health Centers…
To help people discover a lifestyle of meaning joy and fulfillment through treatment and training. emerge ministries inc. is devoted to serving our clients. this service encompasses a biblically based mental health center with…
To provide affordable, accessible, and quality healthcare.
Assist the homeless to rise out of poverty
Community Mental Health, Drug Abuse and Alcoholism Services.
To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.
Hospice of northwest ohio provides specialized medical emotional and spiritual care to people of all ages - and their families - living with any end-stage illness in northwest ohio and southeast michigan
Provide counseling, psychiatry, and case management services to the citizens of stark and surrounding counties in ohio clients served 4,800
Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Health Stark County Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Luke Lutheran Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Beacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc ↗
- Who funds PEGASUS FARM ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
- Who funds STARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TUSCARAWAS CLINIC FOR THE WORKING UNINSURED ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE 2000 COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF MASSILLON INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGVALE HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
- Who funds Hammer & Nails Inc ↗
- Who funds A WHOLE COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds Faith In Action ↗
- Who funds Total Living Center ↗
- Who funds VANTAGE AGING ↗
- Who funds Stark County Diaper Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds Alliance Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Health Foundation of Greater Massillon · North Canton Medical Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · Christ Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Massillon Rotary Foundation Trust · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.