Skip to content

· Public charity

Augusta Health Care Inc

The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.

$588k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$682kFood & Nutrition$404kCommunity Improvement$395kHousing & Shelter$349kCrime & Legal$224kHuman Services$188kEducation$160kCivil Rights$110kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $394,055, the rows itemized in this filing. The $588,431 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $194,376 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $283k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Central Shenandoah Planning$71,555
Valley Hope Counseling Center$25,000
Valley Children's Advocacy Center$25,000
Renewing Homes of Greater Augusta$25,000
Blue Ridge CASA for Children Inc$25,000
Project Grows$25,000
Magnolia Rose Cottage Inc$25,000
The Neighbor Bridge Inc$25,000
Valley Mission$20,000
Blue Ridge Court Services$20,000
Blue Ridge Area Food Bank Nework$20,000
Valley Program for Aging$15,000
Waynesboro Area Refuge Ministry Inc$12,500
Boys & Girls Clubs$10,000
Jones Gardens$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VALLEY HOPE COUNSELING CENTER: $30k → 8%SIN BARRERAS WITHOUT BARRIERS: $10k → 8%VALLEY HOPE COUNSELING CENTER: $30k → 8%VALLEY HOPE COUNSELING CENTER: $30k → 8%VALLEY HOPE COUNSELING CENTER: $25k → 8%VALLEY HOPE COUNSELING CENTER: $25k → 8%Valley Hope Counseling Center: $25k → 8%Magnolia Rose Cottage Inc: $25k → 8%Valley Program for Aging: $15k → 8%VALLEY PROGRAM FOR THE AGING: $10k → 8%VALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGING SERVICES: $8k → 8%VALLEY PROGRAM FOR THE AGING: $8k → 8%Embrace Center For Community: $5k → 8%SHENANDOAH LGBTQ CENTER: $63k → 8%VALLEY AREA COMMUNITY SUPPORT: $20k → 8%SHENANDOAH LGBQ CENTER: $7k → 8%SHENANDOAH LGBTQ CENTER: $7k → 8%The Neighbor Bridge Inc: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 25 repeat orgs$367k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$2.4M
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+23%

Still filing today

80%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AHC Community Health Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $307k · revenue +30%
  • VM
    VALLEY MISSION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $175k · revenue +118%
  • VH
    VALLEY HOPE COUNSELING CENTER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • AM
    ALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $90k · revenue -65%
  • AR
    AUGUSTA REGIONAL CLINIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +32%
  • AR
    AUGUSTA RESOURCES FOR RESILIENCE OPPORTUNITY & WELLNESS
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
2
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
3
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal
4
Casa of Central Virginia Inc

Casa of central va, inc. recruits, trains and supports volunteer advocates for abused and neglected children involved in juvenile court proceedings in the 24th judicial district and educates the community about the needs of these children.

Civil Rights
5
Virginia Legal Aid Society Inc

The mission of Virginia Legal Aid Society is to resolve serious legal problems of low-income people, promote economic and family stability, reduce poverty through effective legal assistance, and to champion equal justice.

Crime & Legal
6
Branches Domestic Violence Shelter Inc

Crisis counseling and shelter

Human Services
7
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
8
Groundworks Collaborative Inc

Groundworks collaborative, inc. provides emergency shelter, housing assistance & a food shelf for homeless persons.

—
9
Shenandoah Area Agency On Aging

The shenandoah area agency on aging (saaa) provides and coordinatesprograms and services which promote the independence, dignity, healthand well being of senior and disabled persons. saaa serves the counties of clarke, frederick, page,…

Human Services
10
Virginia Poverty Law Center Inc

Virginia poverty law center uses advocacy, education, and litigation to break down systemic barriers that keep low-income virginians in the cycle of poverty.

Crime & Legal
11
Valley Care Association

The mission of valley care association is to offer quality programs and services that focus on the strengths of our clients, enriching their lives and keeping them in their homes while providing peace of mind, support and respite for their…

Human Services
12
Shenandoah Valley Medical System I

To promote health and wellness within the community by providing a medical home to reduce barriers to care and ensure access to a full range of coordinated health care and wellness services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Area Community Support Inc Dba Valley Supportive Housing; the most unlike its peers is Charity Navigator. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
26/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL SHENANDOAH PLANNING: $389,520 · OtherCENTRAL SHENANDOAH PLANNINGCITY OF STAUNTON: $96,750 · OtherCITY OF STAUNTONELK HILL FARM INC: $94,500 · OtherELK HILL FARM INCBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $85,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INCAUGUSTA REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC: $60,000 · OtherAUGUSTA REGIONAL DENTAL CLINICARROW PROJECT: $45,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $38,750 · OtherBLUE RIDGE CASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $110,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE CASA FOR CHILDREN INCRENEWING HOMES OF GREATER AUGUSTA INC: $40,000 · Other+13 more: $149,800 · Other+13 moreVALLEY HOPE COUNSELING CENTER: $165,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY HOPE COUNSE…LGBT TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $87,000 · Human ServicesLGBT TECHNOLOGY IN…VALLEY AREA COMMUNITY SUPPORT INC DBA VALLEY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $75,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY AREA COMMUN…Charity Navigator: $46,000 · Human ServicesCharity NavigatorVALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGING SERVICES: $41,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY PROGRAM FOR…MAGNOLIA ROSE COTTAGE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesMAGNOLIA ROSE COTT…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesAHC Community Health Foundation: $307,240 · HealthAHC Community Hea…AUGUSTA REGIONAL CLINIC INC: $40,000 · HealthAUGUSTA REGIONAL …BRAIN INJURY CONNECTIONS OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $35,500 · HealthBRAIN INJURY CONN…AUGUSTA RESOURCES FOR RESILIENCE OPPORTUNITY & WELLNESS: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $25,000 · Health+2 moreVALLEY MISSION INC: $175,000 · Housing & ShelterWAYNESBORO AREA REFUGE MINISTRY INC: $37,500 · Housing & ShelterPROJECT GROWS INC: $118,750 · Food & NutritionALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $90,000 · Food & NutritionMARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY: $120,000 · EducationOUR COMMUNITY PLACE: $71,555 · EducationVALLEY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $109,000 · Crime & LegalBLUE RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $25,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,109,320Human Services$454,000Health$422,740Housing & Shelter$212,500Food & Nutrition$208,750Education$191,555Crime & Legal$134,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAHC Community Health Foundation: $307,240 over 2y, 13% of budgetVALLEY MISSION INC: $175,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetVALLEY HOPE COUNSELING CENTER: $165,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetMARY BALDWIN UNIVERSITY: $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT GROWS INC: $118,750 over 7y, 11% of budgetBLUE RIDGE CASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $110,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $109,000 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetELK HILL FARM INC: $94,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $90,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetLGBT TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: $87,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY AREA COMMUNITY SUPPORT INC DBA VALLEY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $75,000 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetOUR COMMUNITY PLACE: $71,555 over 1y, 13% of budgetCharity Navigator: $46,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVALLEY PROGRAM FOR AGING SERVICES: $41,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRENEWING HOMES OF GREATER AUGUSTA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetAUGUSTA REGIONAL CLINIC INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWAYNESBORO AREA REFUGE MINISTRY INC: $37,500 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetBRAIN INJURY CONNECTIONS OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $35,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetMAGNOLIA ROSE COTTAGE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetCreative Works Farm Inc: $28,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJONES GARDENS: $16,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetCENTRAL SHENANDOAH EMS COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF STAUNTON AUGUSTA COUNTY & WAYNESBORO INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS CENTER INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRECLAIMED HOPE INITIATIVE: $12,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA (GROUP RETURN): $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVerona Community Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetVALLEY ASSOCIATES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Central Blue RidgeVA55.4× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Central Blue Ridge · United Way of Staunton Augusta County & Waynesboro Inc · The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Houff Charitable Foundation · Sentara Health · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Tr Ua George R & Evelyn W Brothers · United Way of Central Shenandoah Valley Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation · Carmax Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Augusta Health Care Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Augusta Health Care Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Augusta Health Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph