Skip to content

· Public charity

Atlantic Council of the United States Inc

The atlantic council, through its research and analysis, promotes constructive leadership and engagement in international affairs based on the central role of the atlantic community in meeting global challenges.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$399k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.9MInternational$1.3MPublic Benefit$1.2MCivil Rights$1.2MEducation$304kSocial Science$175kScience & Tech$131kHealth$68k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $1,383,449, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,760,783 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $377,334 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $632k
  • $250k+2 grants · $682k
$102,155
Median grant
8
States reached
$136M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TECHSOUP GLOBAL$399,481
ACTON INSTITUTE$282,520
ATLAS NETWORK$204,380
RHODIUM GROUP LLC$175,000
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC$102,155
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$81,345
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$69,419
MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE$32,227
REWRITE MEDIA INC$19,000
THE GAME CONSULTANT LLC$17,922
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TECHSOUP GLOBAL: $399k → 10%WANTED FOR NOTHING: $79k → 14%BLUE MARBLE MICROINSURANCE INC: $363k → 17%JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC: $907k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $81k → 14%APPLIED CLIMATOLOGISTS INC: $409k → 10%THE GAME CONSULTANT LLC: $137k → 13%THE MIAMI FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%MARKETING FOR CHANGE CO: $86k → 19%ACTON INSTITUTE: $692k → 11%ROSE CITY GAMES: $25k → 12%REWRITE MEDIA INC: $56k → 10%ATLAS NETWORK: $285k → 7%IMAGINARY OFFICE: $28k → 7%TECHSOUP GLOBAL: $202k → 10%WANTED FOR NOTHING: $52k → 14%BLUE MARBLE MICROINSURANCE INC: $167k → 17%JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC: $243k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $67k → 14%THE GAME CONSULTANT LLC: $18k → 13%ACTON INSTITUTE: $283k → 11%REWRITE MEDIA INC: $19k → 10%ATLAS NETWORK: $253k → 7%TECHSOUP: $152k → 10%MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE: $32k → 17%JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC: $102k → 14%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $49k → 14%ACTON INSTITUTE: $193k → 11%ATLAS NETWORK: $204k → 7%RHODIUM GROUP LLC: $175k → 17%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $17k → 14%ANIMA INTERACTIVE LLC: $10k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $69k → 14%PAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $379k → 14%PAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $255k → 14%PAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $138k → 14%CLIMATE ADVISORS: $116k → 14%PAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $118k → 14%PLANET3 INC: $75k → 14%CLIMATE ADVISERS INC: $89k → 14%PAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $60k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MI
NY
OR
CA
VA
NC
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $358k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$317k · 88% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORTING WORK ON TRANSATLANTIC AND GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT · SUPPORTING WORK ON CLIMATE CHANGE, MIGRATION, AND SECURITY. · SUPPORTING WORK ON DIGITAL FORENSIC RESEARCH AND TRAINING

South America$27k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORTING WORK ON CLIMATE CHANGE, MIGRATION, AND SECURITY.

South Asia$15k · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORTING WORK ON CLIMATE CHANGE, MIGRATION, AND SECURITY.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Atlantic Council of the United States Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 21% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 8%.

Atlantic Council of the United States Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 10 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$5.6M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+173%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $277k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JE
    JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.3M
  • AI
    Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue -18%
  • PA
    PAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $949k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • BM
    BLUE MARBLE MICROINSURANCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $530k
  • AC
    APPLIED CLIMATOLOGISTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $409k
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $91k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
The Brookings Institution

The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…

Social Science
6
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
7
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

—
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
11
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Techsoup Global. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC: $1,251,971 · OtherJACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INCTECHSOUP GLOBAL: $753,392 · OtherTECHSOUP GLOBALATLAS NETWORK: $742,130 · OtherATLAS NETWORKBLUE MARBLE MICROINSURANCE INC: $529,954 · OtherBLUE MARBLE MICROINSURANCE INCAPPLIED CLIMATOLOGISTS INC: $408,980 · OtherAPPLIED CLIMATOLOGISTS INCCLIMATE ADVISERS INC: $205,000 · OtherRHODIUM GROUP LLC: $175,000 · Other+10 more: $743,816 · Other+10 moreActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $1,167,567 · Civil RightsActon Institute fo…PAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $949,194 · InternationalPAN AMERICAN DE…+1 more: $32,227 · InternationalGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $214,828 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $69,419 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $20,000 · EducationTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $5,013 · Philanthropy
Other$4,810,243Civil Rights$1,167,567International$981,421Education$304,247Philanthropy$5,013

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $1,167,567 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetPAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $949,194 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTECHSOUP GLOBAL: $753,392 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $214,828 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $90,920 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $69,419 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE: $32,227 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $5,013 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ↗
  • Who funds PAN AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TECHSOUP GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS ↗
  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Atlantic Council of the United States Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atlantic Council of the United States Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Atlantic Council of the United States’ filings →

More from the funding graph