Skip to content

· Private foundation

Atj Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$305kReligion$298kEnvironment$85kInternational$70kHealth$25kFood & Nutrition$8kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLD$75,000
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$30,000
TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,000
FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS$10,000
GIVE KIDS THE WORLD$10,000
DECATUR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
HEART OF GEORGIA FCA$7,500
LAURENS BAPTIST ASSOC JOY FOODS$7,500
HOLY COMFORTER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$5,000
PEO FOUNDATION$5,000
SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS: $10k → 16%GIVE KIDS THE WORLD: $10k → 13%INDEPENDENCE LANDING: $5k → 19%PEO FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%LIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLD: $75k → 10%FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 6%FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15k → 8%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $50k → 13%DECATUR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15k → 14%HEART OF GEORGIA FCA: $8k → 21%ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS: $10k → 16%HOLY COMFORTER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $10k → 19%PEO FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 8%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $30k → 13%DECATUR FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%EAST LAURENS HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 21%HOLY COMFORTER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 19%PEO FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 8%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $20k → 13%DECATUR FIRST UMC: $10k → 14%POPLAR SPRINGS SOUTH BAPTIST CHURCH: $15k → 21%HOLY COMFORTER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 19%PEO FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 8%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $20k → 13%DECATUR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%ABC WOMENS CLINIC OF DUBLIN GA: $10k → 21%HOLY COMFORTER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 19%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $20k → 13%DECATUR FIRST UMC: $5k → 14%IRISH GIFTED ACADEMY: $10k → 21%HOLY COMFORTER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 19%TRINITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 13%DECATUR FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 14%DUBLIN FIRST UMC: $10k → 21%SUWANEE RIVER AREA COUNCIL: $5k → 19%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 13%DECATUR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 14%DUBLIN FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $10k → 21%VILLA INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 14%LAURENS BAPTIST ASSOC JOY FOODS: $8k → 21%VILLA INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%EVERHART EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%VILLA INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%EVERHART EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%EVERHART EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$650k · 14 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$650k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+176%

Still filing today

36%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    Georgia State University Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $190k · revenue +189%
  • VI
    VILLA INTERNATIONAL ATLANTA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +56%
  • EE
    EVERHART EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +220%

Funded once

  • PS
    POPLAR SPRINGS SOUTH BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • FP
    FAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Inclusive Development International

Inclusive Development International supports communities around the world to defend their rights and resources in the face of harmful corporate activities and internationally financed development projects, and we advocate for a more just…

International
2
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
3
Inteleos

Inteleos is a non-profit certification organization that delivers rigorous assessments and cultivates a global community of professionals dedicated to the highest standards in healthcare and patient safety.

—
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
6
International Generosity Foundation Trust

International generosity foundation trust is a grantmaking organization that supports and makes distributions to charitable, religious, scientific, and educational causes, with a focus on making global giving easy.

Religion
7
Water for Good

Water for good's mission is to transform lives through sustainable access to safe water as well as improved sanitation and hygiene in the places that need it most.

International
8
Institute for the International Education of Students

The Institute for the International Education of Students (IES) blends the best elements of foreign higher education with American University requirements and encourages students to explore the unique elements of foreign countries.…

Education
9
Georgia Tech Global Inc

To engage in charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes and to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of georgia institute of technology (git) and to support its…

Education
10
Development Gateway Inc

Development gateway (dg) creates tools and design processes that help collect, visualize, and use data for a more equitable world. for 20 years, we have built systems, dashboards, and tools to create more effective, open, and engaging…

International
11
University of South Florida Institute of Applied Engineering

The institute of applied engineering (iae) is a type i supporting organization of the university of south florida and it serves the interests of the american warfighter across diverse settings, encompassing the battlefield, garrison, and…

Philanthropy
12
IDENTITY2020 Systems Inc

Id2020 brings together diverse voices to set technical requirements, influence policy, and accelerate the implementation of digital id programs that benefit the most vulnerable.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Waters for the World; the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $150,000 · OtherTRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHFAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherFAITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHOLY COMFORTER EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL: $35,000 · OtherHOLY COMFORTER EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOLDECATUR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherDECATUR PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHDUBLIN FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherDECATUR FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherABC WOMENS CLINIC OF DUBLIN GA: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherPOPLAR SPRINGS SOUTH BAPTIST CHURCH: $15,000 · Other+11 more: $90,000 · Other+11 moreGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $190,000 · EducationGeorgia State University Foundati…EVERHART EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EducationEVERHART EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION IN…PEO Foundation: $20,000 · EducationPEO FoundationLIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLD: $75,000 · InternationalLIVING WATERS…ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $20,000 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGAN…VILLA INTERNATIONAL ATLANTA INC: $50,000 · ReligionINDEPENDENCE LANDING INC: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$430,000Education$245,000International$95,000Religion$50,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $190,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVILLA INTERNATIONAL ATLANTA INC: $50,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetEVERHART EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEO Foundation: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE LANDING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds VILLA INTERNATIONAL ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERHART EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEO Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE LANDING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Atj Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atj Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Atj Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph