Skip to content
Atid Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Atid Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$345k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$1.7MEducation$338kArts & Culture$220kHousing & Shelter$108kPhilanthropy$92kFood & Nutrition$63kHuman Services$46kInternational$44kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $341k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
  • $250k+2 grants · $641k
$7,400
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Learning Center$345,283
Individual grant recipient$295,461
Chasdei Yitzchok Inc$60,000
Friends of United Hatzalah$51,417
Or Pinchas Inc$37,500
Yotzer Ohr$36,000
Torat Moshe$34,000
Individual grant recipient$33,510
Individual grant recipient$32,153
Beth El Orthodox Kehila$29,712
Yedidim USA$28,428
Hakart Hatov Inc$21,983
American Friends of K'nees Ades$20,000
American Friend of Chasdei Yosef$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,951
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 73% of grant dollars ($2.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 27% that went abroad ($993k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Rayim for Chaim: $18k → 14%Committee for the Rescue of Israel: $15k → 20%Yedidim USA Inc: $56k → 13%Yedidim USA: $28k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
NC
SC
FL

Beyond the US: 27% of all-years giving ($993k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$990k · 8 grants
Bahamas$3k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 27 repeat orgs$741k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
36

Total granted

$2.9M
$557k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+29%

Still filing today

26%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $184k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
PhilanthropyReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YABIA OMER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $212k · revenue +5%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $175k · revenue +63%
  • YO
    YOTZER OHR INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $108k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • HO
    Hatzalah of South Florida Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • HC
    HIDABROOT CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $72k · revenue +125%
  • YY
    Yad Yosef Torah Center
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
6
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
9
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
10
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
11
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Netivey Ohr Yaakov Inc; the most unlike its peers is Team Strive Elite Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $902,618 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH LEARNING CENTER INC: $405,283 · OtherJEWISH LEARNING CENTER INCChabad of Panhandle Tallahassee Inc: $190,600 · OtherChabad of Panhandle Tallahassee IncJEWISH SCHOOL OF MIAMI CORP: $150,000 · OtherJEWISH SCHOOL OF MIAMI CORPIndividual grant recipient: $138,792 · OtherHatzalah of South Florida Inc: $100,000 · Other+60 more: $879,651 · Other+60 moreYABIA OMER: $212,000 · ReligionTORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI INC: $68,961 · Religion+2 more: $10,340 · ReligionFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $175,017 · Arts & CultureYOTZER OHR INC: $108,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TOMER DEVORAH SEMINA RY INC: $23,050 · EducationYESHIVAT TORAT YOSEF INC: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationHIDABROOT CORP: $72,300 · PhilanthropyNECHAMA AND HATZALA INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI YOSEF: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF SHEARIM HAMETSUYANIMINC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SHEARIM USA CHARITABLE TRUST: $10,000 · PhilanthropyYEDIDIM USA INC: $84,905 · Human ServicesCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesCommittee for the Rescue of Israel Babies DBA Efrat: $15,000 · Human ServicesAGUDAS TOV V'CHESED INC: $28,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KNEES ADES INC: $20,000 · InternationalNETIVEY OHR YAAKOV INC: $18,000 · International
Other$2,766,944Religion$291,301Arts & Culture$175,017Education$137,050Philanthropy$134,300Human Services$117,905International$66,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYABIA OMER: $212,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $175,017 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOTZER OHR INC: $108,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetYEDIDIM USA INC: $84,905 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetHIDABROOT CORP: $72,300 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetAGUDAS TOV V'CHESED INC: $28,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TOMER DEVORAH SEMINA RY INC: $23,050 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNECHAMA AND HATZALA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI YOSEF: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KNEES ADES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCommittee for the Rescue of Israel Babies DBA Efrat: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $13,600 over 1y, 60% of budgetFRIENDS OF SHEARIM HAMETSUYANIMINC: $12,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SHEARIM USA CHARITABLE TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSHUVU BANIM MIAMI INC: $8,200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetYESHIVAT TORAT YOSEF INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP DORA GOLDING: $4,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA MAMAR MORDECHAI NADVORNA: $2,140 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OPTIMIST CLUB OF COOPER CITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM STRIVE ELITE ACADEMY INC: $1,800 over 1y, 17% of budgetMESIFTA OF GREATER MIAMI-LOUIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YABIA OMER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YOTZER OHR INC ↗
  • Who funds YEDIDIM USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HIDABROOT CORP ↗
  • Who funds TORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDAS TOV V'CHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TOMER DEVORAH SEMINA RY INC ↗
  • Who funds NECHAMA AND HATZALA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI YOSEF ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KNEES ADES INC ↗
  • Who funds NETIVEY OHR YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Committee for the Rescue of Israel Babies DBA Efrat ↗
  • Who funds OUR PLACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Greater Miami Jewish …Alice G Hanson Family…The Diesel Foundation…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…The Setton FoundationUnited Jewish Communi…The Zev and Susan Mun…Chehebar Family Found…National Society for …
Jewish Communal FundNY30.7× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Alice G Hanson Family Foundation · The Diesel Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · United Jewish Community of Broward County Inc · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Atid Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atid Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Atid Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Atid Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Atid’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home