· Public charity
Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America Inc
The asthma and allergy foundation of america, inc (the foundation), a not-for-profit founded in 1953, is dedicated to saving lives and reducing the burden of disease for people with asthma and allergies through support, advocacy, education and research.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $162k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $253k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AIRNYC | $93,750 |
| MICHIGAN CHAPTER ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $93,750 |
| YOUNG TEEN ASTHMA & WELLNESS CAMP INC | $65,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER | $47,000 |
| BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $44,690 |
| HEALTH PROMOTION COUNCIL | $31,250 |
| THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION | $28,750 |
| ALASKA CHAPTER ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMichigan Chapter Asthma & Allergy Foundation of America3× · 2022–2024 · $219k · revenue +26% · 44% of their budget
- AIAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESPIRATORY EQUITY2× · 2022–2023 · $125k · revenue +361%
- BSBreathe Southern California2× · 2022–2023 · $125k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- ROREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGOone grant, 2020 · $200k
- NENational Eczema Associationgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue +81%
- ITInternational Topical Steroid Awareness Network Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue +238%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To find treatments and cures for the millions of people suffering from allergies, asthma and other immunologic diseases by supporting education and research.
Mission is to prevent lung disease, promote clean air and help people live better through education, research, and policy change.
The pennsylvania association of allergy and asthma serves as an advocate for patients with allergic, asthmatic, and immunological disorders in the commonwealth of pennsylvania. we promote and encourage research and the study of allergy,…
Chicago asthma consortium seeks to improve quality of life for those with asthma through advocacy, education and collaboration. cac brings together medical and public health professionals, business leaders, government agencies,…
The asthma and allergy foundation of america, inc (the foundation), a not-for-profit founded in 1953, is dedicated to saving lives and reducing the burden of disease for people with asthma and allergies through support, advocacy, education…
Presentation of a three day seminar for those interested in the field of allergy and respiratory medicene.
Faact's mission is to educate, advocate, and raise awareness for all individuals and families affected by food allergies and life-threatening anaphylaxis. faact is also your voice for food allergy awareness.
The mission of the american lung association in california (ala in ca) is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung diseases.
To further & support research in the field of early diagnosis & treatment of disease. primarily engaging in continuous, active conduct of research to develop the knowledge base for the practice of screening for early diseases such as lung…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allergy and Asthma Network - Mothers of Asthmatics Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Topical Steroid Awareness Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Michigan Chapter Asthma & Allergy Foundation of America ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESPIRATORY EQUITY ↗
- Who funds Breathe Southern California ↗
- Who funds ALLERGY AND ASTHMA NETWORK - MOTHERS OF ASTHMATICS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG TEEN ASTHMA & WELLNESS CAMP ↗
- Who funds National Eczema Association ↗
- Who funds International Topical Steroid Awareness Network Inc ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds Health Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania Inc ↗
- Who funds ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ALASKA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.