Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Association of Migraine Disorders

TO RAISE MONEY FOR MIGRAINE RESEARCH, RAISE AWARENESS OF MIGRAINE DISORDERS IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC, AND IMPROVE MEDICAL EDUCATION ABOUT THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE DISORDERS.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$498kEducation$188kScience & Tech$93kCommunity Improvement$55kCivil Rights$5kInternational$1kReligion$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$508k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$67,038
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$50,000
NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE C MONDINO FOUNDATION$10,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$494
Individual grant recipient$407
Individual grant recipient$185
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND: $100 → 7%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $63k → 16%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $10k → 10%HUMAN ARTS ASSOCIATION: $120k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $50k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 21%US PAIN FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%SCHOLARSHIP PAYMENTS (5 INDIVIDUALS): $3k → 7%BROWN UNIVERSITY OF BRAIN SCIENCE: $55k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $10k → 10%MIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $55k → 17%BROWN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCE: $54k → 14%MIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF RI: $2k → 14%MIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%CURE ALLIANCE FOR MENTAL ILLNESS: $5k → 14%MIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $48k → 17%CURE ALLIANCE FOR MENTAL ILLNESS INC: $5k → 14%CURE ALLIANCE FOR MENTAL ILLNESS INC: $3k → 14%CURE ALLIANCE FOR MENTAL ILLNESS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
NC
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Association of Migraine Disorders’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Association of Migraine Disorderslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$490k · 6 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
35

Total granted

$490k
$292k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+41%

Still filing today

17%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $203k · revenue -87%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM
    2× · 2023–2025 · $125k
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • HA
    HUMAN ARTS ASSOCIATION LTD
    one grant, 2017 · $120k · revenue -99% · 42% of their budget
  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $63k
  • BU
    BROWN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCE
    one grant, 2018 · $54k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge

The mission of the university of cambridge is to contribute to society through the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. organizationally, we achieve this through two divisions…

6
Yale University

To improve the world through research, scholarship, education, preservation, and practice.

Education
7
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

8
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

11
University Neurology Inc

To advance the health and wellness across the life span for the people of western new york and the world through the education of tomorrow's leaders in health care and biomedical sciences, innovative research, and outstanding clinical…

Health
12
The Rockefeller University

The rockefeller university (the university) is a world renowned center for research and graduate education in the biomedical sciences, chemistry, bioinformatics, and physics. the university's 73 laboratories conduct both clinical and basic…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brown University and the most unlike its peers is Carl Hinsman for Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $203,000 · OtherMIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $124,538 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMHUMAN ARTS ASSOCIATION LTD — $120,000 · OtherHUMAN ARTS ASSOCIATION LTDMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $62,698 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALBROWN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCE — $53,500 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCETHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAROLINA — $29,067 · Other+39 more — $90,949 · Other+39 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNI…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $10,450 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSIT…+1 more — $26 · EducationBROWN UNIVERSITY — $55,225 · Community ImprovementUS PAIN FOUNDATION INC — $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $100 · Health
Other$683,752Education$110,476Community Improvement$55,225Health$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $203,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetHUMAN ARTS ASSOCIATION LTD — $120,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $55,225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $10,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF RI INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUS PAIN FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARL HINSMAN FOR CHARITIES — $500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $26 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HUMAN ARTS ASSOCIATION LTD
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF RI INC
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds US PAIN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CARL HINSMAN FOR CHARITIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Association of Migraine Disorders funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Association of Migraine Disorders?

    Find your warmest path to Association of Migraine Disorders through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph