How much did ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

studentspreparationbusiness leadersclassaccounting educationglobaltalent

2020

enhancestudentspreparationclassaccounting educationglobalbusiness

2021

integratedreportingdisclosure standardsfinancialaccounting educationdevelopglobal

2022

—

2023

businessglobalapitalentexcellence

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$82M

Total assets

Largest grants

OUT FOR UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS CONFERENCE INC$16,000
THE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION$12,500
NCPACA FOUNDATION INC$10,000
NABA - NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACCOUNTANTS INC$10,000
CPA SOCIETY EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATION$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 64% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 93% of ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 25% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIEDlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$495k · 9 repeat orgs$302k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$495k

$276k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%

+23%

Still filing today

89%

63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsMembership BenefitEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NN
NABA- NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACCOUNTANTS INC
5× · 2019–2024 · $99k · revenue +313%
A
ASCEND
4× · 2019–2023 · $53k · revenue +105%
A
ALPFA
3× · 2019–2021 · $50k · revenue +7599%

Funded once

AF
AICPA FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -67% · 39% of their budget
WI
WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2020 · $15k
VR
VALUE REPORTING FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

American Institute of Certified Public

The aicpa is a membership organization that serves and unites the accountancy profession.

—

Aacsb International - the Association to

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education

Financial Planning Association

Fpa fosters the value of financial planning and advances the financial planning profession.

Community Improvement

National Council of Beta Alpha Psi

The mission of beta alpha psi, the premier international honor and service organization for financial and business information students and professionals, is to inspire and support excellence by:- encouraging the study and practice of…

—

Ohio Society of Certified Public Accountants

Fostering professional excellence and integrity, building community and advocating for members and those they serve.

—

National Asian Pacific American Bar

—

International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education

Maryland Association of Certified Public

Making a positive impact by connecting, protecting, and helping a cpa-led profession achieve success.

—

National Society of Accountants

Helping members achieve success in the profession of accountancy and taxation.

—

American Society of Association

The american society of association executives (asae) is an individual membership organization of more than 50,000 association executives and industry partners representing more than 7,400 organizations. its members manage leading trade…

—

University Professional and Continuing

University professional and continuing education association (upcea) advances leadership in professional, continuing and online education. the association is dedicated to meeting the needs of professional members and the institutions they…

Education

National Association for College

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Society of Cpa's Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Accounting Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

06the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/17

Grantees still filing

14/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$551,381Education$102,500Community Improvement$70,000Civil Rights$37,500Membership Benefit$20,000Employment$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Institute of Certified PublicNC18.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Institute of Certified Public · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Rsm US Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AICPA FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~16 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 136168775 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on AICPA FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 39% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Association of International Certified?

Find your warmest path to Association of International Certified through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Association of International Certified?

More from the funding graph

ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Association of International Certified?

More from the funding graph