Skip to content
Association of Indian Physicians of Northern Ohio at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Association of Indian Physicians of Northern Ohio

To use the resources and knowledge of the organization for the health and welfare of the community served through educational programs, medical assistance and medical research.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$136kInternational$87kEducation$40kPhilanthropy$15kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $31,770, the rows itemized in this filing. The $78,522 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,752 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$6,117
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WYANDOT MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$15,001
OTHER 5K$6,117
SEWA INTERNATIONAL$5,651
O'NEIL HEALTHCARE$5,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 16%WOMENSAFE INC: $10k → 17%BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $28k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

India$28k · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE · MEDICAL CAMP

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$92k · 3 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +202% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$92k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+202%
+16%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $40k · revenue +202%
  • O5
    OTHER 5K
    2× · 2023–2024 · $33k
  • BR
    BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • AL
    ANNIE L DAWSON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • RC
    Rotary Club of Bakersfield
    one grant, 2020 · $19k · revenue +22%
  • DM
    DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
3
Pkd Foundation

We give hope. we fund research, advocate for patients, and build a community for all impacted by pkd.

—
4
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
American Neuromuscular Foundation

The american neuromuscular foundation was established to improve the quality of care for people with disorders of skeletal muscle, neuromuscular function, and central and peripheral nervous systems through the promotion of research and…

Health
7
Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation Inc

The sarnoff cardiovascular research foundation is dedicated to cultivating the next generation of physician-leaders in cardiovascular medicine by funding and supporting medical students and physicians engaged in transformative research.

Health
8
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
9
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating a cure for each and every multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies,…

Health
12
National Kidney Foundation of Illinois

The national kidney foundation of illinois improves the health and well-being of people at risk for or affected by kidney disease through prevention, education, and empowerment.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International; the most unlike its peers is Annie L Dawson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $81,735 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY …OTHER 5K: $32,651 · OtherOTHER 5KRotary Club of Bakersfield: $19,000 · OtherRotary Club of BakersfieldWYANDOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15,001 · OtherWYANDOT HEALTH FOUNDATIONCAMP HO MITA KODA: $7,000 · OtherCAMP HO MITA KODAO'NEIL HEALTHCARE: $5,001 · OtherO'NEIL HEALTHCARECOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC: $39,567 · EducationCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLE…ANNIE L DAWSON FOUNDATION: $19,567 · EducationANNIE L DAWSON FOUNDATI…DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthDYSTONIA MED…RECOVERY RESOURCES: $10,000 · HealthRECOVERY RES…National Kidney Foundation Inc: $7,500 · HealthNational Kid…BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Human ServicesBENJAMIN R…Sewa International Inc: $5,651 · Human ServicesSewa Inter…THE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public Benefit
International$81,735Other$78,653Education$59,134Health$32,500Human Services$25,651Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $81,735 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC: $39,567 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRotary Club of Bakersfield: $19,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetWYANDOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15,001 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetDYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRECOVERY RESOURCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $5,651 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of Indian Physicians of Northern Ohio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of Indian Physicians of Northern Ohio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Association of Indian Physicians of Northern Ohio?

    Find your warmest path to Association of Indian Physicians of Northern Ohio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Association of Indian Physicians of Northern Ohio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home