Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Association of Graduates of the United States Air Force Academy

To serve graduates, preserve the heritage of the academy and long blue line, and support usafa in its mission to develop leaders of character for the department of the air force, the united states space force, and nation.(continued on sch o)we do this by: a.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$859k
Largest
01What you fund
0162% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$19MEducation$225kOther$12M
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $1,045,689 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,662,608 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,616,919 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $132k
  • $250k+1 grant · $859k
$131,564
Median grant
2
States reached
$131M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION$859,461
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY$131,564
FALCON FOUNDATION$29,840
AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$24,824
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Class of 2010 Foundation: $131k → 9%Air Force Academy Foundation: $10.4M → 9%United States Air Force Academy: $5.6M → 9%Air Force Academy Foundation: $3.8M → 9%United States Air Force Academy: $2.5M → 9%Air Force Academy Foundation: $1.4M → 9%United States Air Force Academy: $1.1M → 9%United States Air Force Academy: $1.1M → 9%United States Air Force Academy: $1.0M → 9%United States Air Force Academy: $883k → 9%AIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $859k → 9%United States Air Force Academy: $317k → 9%Air Force Academy Athletic Corporation: $215k → 9%Air Force Academy Foundation: $199k → 9%UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY: $132k → 9%Air Force Academy Athletic Corporation: $119k → 9%United States Air Force Academy: $112k → 9%Air Force Academy Athletic Corporation: $77k → 9%Air Force Academy Athletic Corporation: $65k → 9%Falcon Foundation: $33k → 9%Falcon Foundation: $31k → 9%Falcon Foundation: $30k → 9%Falcon Foundation: $30k → 9%FALCON FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%Falcon Foundation: $24k → 9%Falcon Foundation: $24k → 9%Falcon Foundation: $22k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 33% of Association of Graduates of the United States Air Force Academy’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 66% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Association of Graduates of the United States Air Force Academylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$30M · 6 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$30M
$131k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19M · revenue +31%
  • TA
    The AFIT Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $267k · revenue +901% · 45% of their budget
  • TF
    The Falcon Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • 2F
    2010 FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $131k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $18,748,970 · PhilanthropyAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATIONUnited States Air Force Academy — $10,526,141 · OtherUnited States Air Force AcademyAIR FORCE ACADEMY ATHLETIC CORPORATION — $475,962 · Other+3 more — $633,920 · Other+3 moreThe Falcon Foundation — $224,573 · Education
Philanthropy$18,748,970Other$11,636,023Education$224,573

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $18,748,970 over 6y, 23% of budgetThe AFIT Foundation — $267,314 over 4y, 45% of budgetThe Falcon Foundation — $224,573 over 8y, 3.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The AFIT Foundation
  • Who funds The Falcon Foundation

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Association of Graduates of the United States Air Force Academy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph