Skip to content
Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York Inc

The association fosters the enactment and enforcement of sanitary laws and regulations for the protection of public health.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$139kHousing & Shelter$61kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kRecreation & Sports$49kEmployment$49kReligion$29kFood & Nutrition$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $60,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $69,086 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,586 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$60,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD 1ST FOUNDATION$60,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $6k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE: $61k → 17%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Foundation for Research of the New York Academy of Osteopathy Inc
—
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
7
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
8
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
9
Debbie's Dream Foundation

Debbie's dream foundation:curing stomach cancer is dedicated to raising awareness about stomach cancer, providing education, advocacy, and support internationally to patients, families, and caregivers affected by the disease, and advancing…

Human Services
10
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope & Heroes Children's Cancer Fund; the most unlike its peers is Olivia's Hope Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION: $55,500 · OtherSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATIONSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $49,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $28,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USAINTERNATIONAL WOMEN AND INFANT SUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL WOMEN AND INFANT SUS…OLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $84,500 · HealthOLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INCHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $44,400 · HealthHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER…COVENANT HOUSE: $61,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSEMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PA…SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY CAMPS …FOOD 1ST FOUNDATION: $60,500 · Public Safety & DisasterFOOD 1ST FOUND…NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC: $48,500 · Public BenefitNY HELMETS …FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$143,000Health$128,900Human Services$77,000Public Safety & Disaster$60,500Public Benefit$48,500Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $84,500 over 1y, 21% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $61,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION: $55,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $49,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC: $48,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $44,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Plumbing Industry Pro…
Plumbing Industry Promotion Fund of New York CityNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Plumbing Industry Promotion Fund of New York City

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home