Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York Inc

The association fosters the enactment and enforcement of sanitary laws and regulations for the protection of public health.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$129kHuman Services$77kPublic Benefit$49kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$143k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $84,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $97,864 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,364 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$84,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OLIVIA HOPE FOUNDATION$84,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $6k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE: $61k → 17%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
Debbie's Dream Foundation

Debbie's dream foundation:curing stomach cancer is dedicated to raising awareness about stomach cancer, providing education, advocacy, and support internationally to patients, families, and caregivers affected by the disease, and advancing…

Human Services
11
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope & Heroes Children's Cancer Fund and the most unlike its peers is Olivia's Hope Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION — $55,500 · OtherSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATIONSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC — $49,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA — $28,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USAINTERNATIONAL WOMEN AND INFANT SUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL WOMEN AND INFANT SUSTAINA…OLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $84,500 · HealthOLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INCHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND — $44,400 · HealthHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUN…COVENANT HOUSE — $61,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSEMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCR…SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASS…NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC — $48,500 · Public BenefitNY HELMETS TO…FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$143,000Health$128,900Human Services$77,000Public Benefit$48,500Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $84,500 over 1y, 21% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $61,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION — $55,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC — $49,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC — $48,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND — $44,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Plumbing Industry Promotion Fund of New York CityNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Plumbing Industry Promotion Fund of New York City

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph