Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aslans Table

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$2kHuman Services$1kCrime & Legal$400Arts & Culture$100Religion$100Health$100Food & Nutrition$100
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Central Arkansas Library Foundation$1,000
South City Community School$300
Central Texas Christian School$300
University of Arkansas Foundation$200
Idaho Food Bank$100
St Pete Free Clinic$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Life Quest of Arkansas: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
0/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Central Arkansas Library Foundation: $1,000 · OtherCentral Arkansas Library FoundationCENTRAL TEXAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $300 · OtherCENTRAL TEXAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCCentral Arkansas Library System: $200 · OtherCentral Arkansas Library SystemArkansas Access to Justice: $200 · OtherArkansas Access to JusticeSt Pete Free Clinic: $100 · OtherSalvation Army: $100 · OtherCalvary Baptist Church: $100 · OtherLIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $1,000 · Human ServicesLIFEQUEST OF ARKANSASSouth City Community School: $300 · EducationSouth City Com…UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $200 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …PULASKI COUNTY FRIENDS OF CASA INC: $200 · Crime & LegalIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $100 · Food & NutritionUS MARSHALS MUSEUM INC: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,000Human Services$1,000Education$500Crime & Legal$200Food & Nutrition$100Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFEQUEST OF ARKANSAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouth City Community School: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPULASKI COUNTY FRIENDS OF CASA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS MARSHALS MUSEUM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aslans Table funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aslans Table. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aslans Table’s filings →

    More from the funding graph