How much did ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH grant in FY2024?

ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH reported 31 grants totaling $1,299,507 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH based?

ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH is based in CA.

ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH

Apiahf is a national health justice organization which influences policy, mobilizes communities,& strengthens programs & organizations to improve the health of asian americans, native hawaiians, & pacific islanders living in the us & its territories.

$1.3M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$94k

Largest

01What you fund

0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$3.1MEducation$2.6MHuman Services$1.7MCivil Rights$1.4MInternational$633kCrime & Legal$405kCommunity Improvement$321kHousing & Shelter$284kArts & Culture$214kOther$3.1M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

apiavoteenvironmentalvaluesenablecivil rightsencourageprocesses

2020

kcscgwpreventionaids epidemiclatino community'sculturally sensitivesupportssan francisco

2021

reachesregentsleadership advancementeliminationtuberculosiscontrolmedicine

2022

kalihi valleysearacequitablesikh legalphysicianscreatecancer

2023

exclusionsan franciscokalihi valleyoutreachsikh legalrefugee immigrantprimary

2024

sikh legalphysiciansactivitiesissuesculturally appropriateenhancetzu

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k18 grants · $508k
$50k–250k13 grants · $827k

$47,500

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

ASIAN PACIFIC PARTNERS FOR EMPOWERMENT$94,167
NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$80,421
ASSOCIATION OF ASIAN PACIFIC COMMHEALTH ORG$73,542
PACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$67,917
ASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$66,250
BUDDHIST TZU CHI MEDICAL FOUNDATION$66,250
OCAPICA$56,667
PHILIPPINE NURSES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA FOUNDATION$56,667
KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NY$55,417
PAPA OLA LOKAHI$54,167
PACIFIC ISLANDER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF WA$54,167
NOELA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERMQVN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$51,667
NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION$50,000
APAICS$47,500
NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION$47,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$13M · 67 repeat orgs$588k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +100% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

67 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$13M

$588k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%

+67%

Still filing today

87%

74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsEducationCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NS
NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +59%
AO
ASSOCIATION OF ASIAN PACIFIC COMMHEALTH ORG
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +223%
PO
PAPA OLA LOKAHI
4× · 2021–2024 · $733k · revenue +384%

Funded once

NC
NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS
one grant, 2019 · $45k · revenue +20%
AA
ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN VOTEgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +563%
KA
KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +82%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Asian American Advocacy Alliance

Community Improvement

The Asian Americans for Community

We strengthen the hope and resiliency of our community members by improving their health, mental health and well-being.

Health

Asian American Health Coalition of the Greater Houston Area

The organization provides quality health care programs and service to individuals in its community, including primary care and preventative services.

Health

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—

National Asian American Pacific Islander

Advocacy group mandated to mental health and well being of Asian American, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders.

Health

Asian AmericansPacific Islanders in

AAPIP expands and mobilizes resources for AAPI communities to build a more just and equitable society.

Philanthropy

Asian Americans Advancing Justice -

The mission of AAAJ-ALC is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian Pacific Islander (API) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist in the United…

Crime & Legal

Aapi Equity Alliance

Aapi equity alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations that advocates for the rights and needs of the asian and pacific islander (api) community in the greater los angeles area, with particular focus on low-income, immigrant,…

Human Services

Asian American Media Inc

Driving the narrative about AAPIs to showcase all that is American about us.

Arts & Culture

The Asian-American Senior Citizen Association

Human Services

Asian American Senior Citizens Service

To provide educational and employment services to the seniors of asian communities.

—

Community Health for Asian American

CHAA partners with the diverse Asian and Pacific Islander communities in an on-going effort to reduce health disparities in a manner that honors and nutures authentic leadership, with the promotion of community, family and consumer…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Pan Asian Community Services and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%3/101

the rest of the field

11%

206,161/1,819,464

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

86 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

84/86

Grantees still filing

74/86

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$3,091,668Other$3,934,027Education$2,616,671Human Services$1,666,946Civil Rights$1,372,425International$632,500Crime & Legal$404,555

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GofundmeorgCA61.2× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gofundmeorg · Asian Americans Advancing Justice · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Wallace H Coulter Foundation · Association of Asian Pacific · Wallace H Coulter Trust · Asian & Pacific Islander American Vote · National Coalition for Asian Pacific · The Kresge Foundation · The Asian American Foundation · Asian Americans Advancing Justice · Tides Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PHILIPPINE NURSES ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK IN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~26 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 133819482 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PHILIPPINE NURSES ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK IN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 26 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 92% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Asian & Pacific Islander American Health?

Find your warmest path to Asian & Pacific Islander American Health through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

86 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Asian & Pacific Islander American Health?

More from the funding graph

ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

86 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Asian & Pacific Islander American Health?

More from the funding graph