Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ascension Foundation

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$632k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$2.7MHealth$1.8MHuman Services$640kHousing & Shelter$335kReligion$270kCrime & Legal$50kFood & Nutrition$10kInternational$10k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+2 grants · $902k
$100,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$97M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC$632,015
FATHERS OF SAINT EDMUND$270,000
LA POSADA HOME INC$100,000
WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST$100,000
WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME$100,000
RENEWAL HOUSE INC$100,000
MAMATOTO VILLAGE INC$100,000
KID ONE TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC$100,000
CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC$100,000
MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE$93,532
HOTEL HOPE$75,000
SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN HEALTH ASSOCIATION$75,000
GIVING AUSTIN LABOR SUPPORT INC$50,000
MOMS MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE INC$50,000
St John Health System Foundation Inc$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $474k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES INC: $30k → 15%ARKANSAS BIRTHING PROJECT: $89k → 17%MAMATOTO VILLAGE INC: $100k → 14%MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC: $55k → 17%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $100k → 19%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
IN
CA
MO
MD
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 7 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$3.3M
$585k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
0%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterInternationalCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +17%
  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M
  • MM
    MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $318k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • AB
    ARKANSAS BIRTHING PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $89k · revenue +60% · 74% of their budget
  • TI
    TrainingGrounds Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
  • MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $55k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ascension Health

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually centered, holistic care,…

Health
2
St Mary's Health Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
3
St Vincent's Medical Center

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
4
Saint Thomas West Hospital

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
5
Ascension Health Alliance

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually centered, holistic care,…

6
Ascension Texas

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
7
St Vincent Health Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
8
St Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
9
St John Health System Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
10
Ascension All Saints Hospital Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
11
St Vincent's Medical Center Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

12
St Marys Warrick Hospital Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Vincent's Birmingham and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Early Childhood Education C…Senior Support ServicesCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%58%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,526

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
14/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $1,415,731 · EducationMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGEUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $632,015 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $317,839 · EducationMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL+2 more — $105,000 · EducationWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,296,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYFATHERS OF ST EDMUND SOUTHERN MISSIONS INC — $270,000 · OtherFATHERS OF ST EDMUND SOUTHERN MISSION…LA POSADA HOME INC — $100,000 · OtherASCENSION DEPAUL SERVICES — $98,800 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN MI HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $75,000 · Other+5 more — $86,161 · OtherKID ONE TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesKID ONE TRANSP…MAMATOTO VILLAGE INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesMAMATOTO VILLA…CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR URB…WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE — $100,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN & CHILDR…THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CH…ARKANSAS BIRTHING PROJECT — $89,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS BIRTH…MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE DIAP…THE O'CONNOR HOUSE — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE O'CONNOR H…Emergency Infant Services Inc — $30,000 · Human ServicesALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM — $100,000 · HealthALEXIAN BRO…RENEWAL HOUSE INC — $100,000 · HealthRENEWAL HOU…Sacred Heart Health System Inc — $57,481 · HealthSacred Hear…St Vincent's Birmingham — $50,000 · HealthSt Vincent'…Saint Thomas Health — $50,000 · HealthSaint Thoma…GIVING AUSTIN LABOR SUPPORT — $50,000 · HealthGIVING AUST…ST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthST JOHN HEA…MOMS MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE INC — $50,000 · HealthMOMS MENTAL…St Agnes Healthcare Inc — $34,131 · HealthSt Agnes He…THE LITTLE TIMMY PROJECT INC — $20,000 · Health+1 more — $15,869 · HealthHOTEL HOPE — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterDEPAUL USA INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterOSTARA INITIATIVE — $50,000 · Crime & LegalCONCERN AMERICA — $10,000 · International
Education$2,470,585Other$1,925,961Human Services$724,000Health$577,481Housing & Shelter$85,000Crime & Legal$50,000International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $1,415,731 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $632,015 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $317,839 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA POSADA HOME INC — $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetRENEWAL HOUSE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetASCENSION DEPAUL SERVICES — $98,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetARKANSAS BIRTHING PROJECT — $89,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetHOTEL HOPE — $75,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTrainingGrounds Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSacred Heart Health System Inc — $57,481 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC — $55,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetSt Vincent's Birmingham — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE O'CONNOR HOUSE — $50,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetOSTARA INITIATIVE — $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetSaint Thomas Health — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC — $46,161 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetSt Agnes Healthcare Inc — $34,131 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJAMES Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetASCENSION ARIZONA — $15,869 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetDEPAUL USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST ALEXIUS OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetSeton Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONCERN AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetST JOSEPH SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASCENSION SETON — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ascension Health AllianceMO19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ascension Health Alliance · Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities Inc · Baptist Community Ministries · WK Kellogg Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ascension Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 36%
  • Center for Urban Families Inc36% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ascension Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ascension Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph