How much did ARTURO & EUNJAE PERALTA-RAMOS grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of ARTURO & EUNJAE PERALTA-RAMOS’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

natureeducation

2019

educationvolleyball

2021

—

2022

atlantasafetyeducational

2023

aid

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k8 grants · $155k
$50k–250k1 grant · $88k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

CAPTAIN PLANET FOUNDATION$88,000
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$30,000
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC$30,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$30,000
GOOD SAMARITAN PRESBYTERIAN$20,000
THE EARTHFIRE INSTITUTE$15,000
SHEPARD CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
BELIEVE IN BELIZE$10,000
GA PROFESSIONAL STANDARD COMMISSION$10,000
AMERICAN CANAL SOCIETY$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 95% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$525k · 6 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$525k

$292k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%

+99%

Still filing today

83%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEnvironmentEducationInternationalCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION
4× · 2018–2023 · $135k · revenue +384%
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND
4× · 2018–2023 · $130k · revenue +46%
SC
SHEPHERD CENTER
2× · 2018–2019 · $52k · revenue +68%

Funded once

CC
CHRIST COVENANT
one grant, 2018 · $140k
AB
ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDENgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue +226%
AC
ALPHA CHI OMEGA
one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Greenpeace Fund Inc

To protect and preserve the environment through the funding of grants to other organizations.

Environment

African Parks Foundation of America

The african parks foundation of america seeks to help conserve africa's national parks for current and future generations. it does so by supporting efforts to improve the long-term management of these globally significant areas, including…

Recreation & Sports

City Wildlife Inc

Protection of wildlife and wildlife habitat.

Education

African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure that wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. afw's vision is of an africa where sustainable development includes thriving wildlife and wild lands as a cultural and economic asset for africa's future…

Animals

Bat Conservation International

Bci's mission is to conserve the world's bats and their ecosystems to ensure a healthy planet.

—

World Resources Institute

To create change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive.

International

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and our planet by creating protected reserves.

International

Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Our vision is to reimagine everyday giving to help charities. our mission is to enable the world's leading online platforms to create opportunities for everyday charitable giving. in doing so, we ensure our programs are trustworthy,…

Philanthropy

Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect wildlife and the environment.

International

Earthjustice

We use the power of the law to protect health, preserve ecosystems, and combat climate change.

Environment

Phoenix Bioinformatics Corporation

Develop an economically and technologically sustainable business model and platform that provides the resources to allow scientific databases to persist, grow and prosper. integrate and systematically organize trusted data into knowledge…

Science & Tech

Inaturalist

To connect people to nature & advance biodiversity science & conservation

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Police Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Michael J Fox Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

9/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$433,100Health$217,500Environment$167,500Education$51,000Crime & Legal$20,000International$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA6.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ARTURO & EUNJAE PERALTA-RAMOS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BUCKHEAD PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 883979877 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BUCKHEAD PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Arturo & Eunjae Peralta-Ramos?

Find your warmest path to Arturo & Eunjae Peralta-Ramos through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ARTURO & EUNJAE PERALTA-RAMOS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Arturo & Eunjae Peralta-Ramos?

More from the funding graph

ARTURO & EUNJAE PERALTA-RAMOS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Arturo & Eunjae Peralta-Ramos?

More from the funding graph