Skip to content

· Public charity

Arts Connect International Inc

Growing creative justice through arts and culture.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$315kEnvironment$23kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $70,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $81,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$838k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABILITIES DANCE BOSTON$10,000
THE FLAVOR CONTINUES$10,000
MIDDAY MOVEMENT SERIES$10,000
ARTS & BUS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
DUNAMIS$10,000
ART IN THE ANTILLES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STUDIO AT 550: $15k → 8%ABILITIES DANCE BOSTON: $14k → 16%ARTS ADMINISTRATORS OF COLOR: $25k → 14%TINY SEED PROJECT: $13k → 12%DANZA ORGNICA: $10k → 16%TINY SEED PROJECT: $10k → 12%ABILITIES DANCE BOSTON: $10k → 16%ABILITIES DANCE BOSTON: $10k → 16%ABILITIES DANCE BOSTON: $9k → 16%DUNAMIS: $15k → 16%ARTS & BUS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTO: $14k → 16%MASSCREATIVE: $14k → 16%DUNAMIS: $14k → 16%THE FLAVOR CONTINUES: $14k → 16%STAGESOURCE: $12k → 16%MIDDAY MOVEMENT SERIES: $10k → 16%MIDDAY MOVEMENT SERIES: $10k → 16%DUNAMIS: $10k → 16%ART IN THE ANTILLES: $10k → 16%ARTS & BUS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTO: $10k → 16%DUNAMIS: $10k → 16%THE FLAVOR CONTINUES: $10k → 16%ART IN THE ANTILLES: $10k → 16%ARTS & BUS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTO: $10k → 16%THE FLAVOR CONTINUES: $10k → 16%DIGITAL SOUP VIA LANI ASUNCION LLC: $10k → 16%DANZA ORGANICA VIA MARSHA PARILLA: $10k → 16%MIDDAY MOVEMENT SERIES: $9k → 16%THE FLAVOR CONTINUES: $9k → 16%MASSCREATIVE: $9k → 16%ART IN THE ANTILLES: $9k → 16%ARTS & BUS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTO: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 8 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against -89% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$276k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
-89%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DUNAMIS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $48k · revenue +18%
  • ABILITIES DANCE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +170%
  • AB
    ARTS & BUSINESS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTON INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • AA
    ARTS ADMINISTRATORS OF COLOR DMV NETWORK
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -89%
  • SA
    STUDIO AT 550
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -95%
  • SI
    StageSource Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Artist Magnet Justice Alliance

providing fiscal sponsorship, producing and professional development services for emerging artists, arts administrators and performing arts organizations throughout California.

Arts & Culture
2
The Tank Ltd

The Tank is a small, Manhattan-based non-profit arts presenter and producer serving emerging artists. Our goal is to remove economic barriers from the creation of new work for artists launching their careers or experimenting within their…

Arts & Culture
3
Guild of Boston Artists Inc
—
4
Rootstock Arts

Foster professional development of creative artists

Arts & Culture
5
(402) Arts Collective

Cultivating a vibrant network of artists who create community and impact culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Circuit Network

artist support services development and management services for the performing arts

Arts & Culture
7
Artnoir Inc

ARTNOIR is a global collective and a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with a mission to celebrate and highlight the work of creatives of color from around the world while catalyzing cultural equity across the arts and culture industries.…

Arts & Culture
8
New Dance Alliance Inc

New Dance Alliance is a performing arts nonprofit. Our mission, from the earliest days, has been to support experimental movement-based artists. In recent years, we have shifted our focus, making an explicit commitment to equity and…

—
9
Boston Arts Summer Institute Inc
Recreation & Sports
10
Amanda&James Incorporated

Amanda + James is a New York-based company dedicated to producing the work of emerging artists. We provide a space for this community to follow creative impulses, refine ideas into projects, and collaborate and learn from their peers. In…

Arts & Culture
11
Departure Arts Inc

Performing and visual arts

Arts & Culture
12
The Art Complex Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Masscreative Inc; the most unlike its peers is Studio At 550. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUNAMIS INC: $48,000 · Arts & CultureDUNAMIS INCABILITIES DANCE INC: $42,000 · Arts & CultureABILITIES DANCE INCARTS & BUSINESS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $42,000 · Arts & CultureARTS & BUSINESS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTON INCARTS ADMINISTRATORS OF COLOR DMV NETWORK: $25,000 · Arts & CultureARTS ADMINISTRATORS OF COLOR DMV NETWORKMASSCREATIVE INC: $22,000 · Arts & CultureMASSCREATIVE INCSTUDIO AT 550: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDIO AT 550StageSource Inc: $12,000 · Arts & CultureStageSource IncThe Flavor Continues Corporation: $42,000 · OtherThe Flavor Continues CorporationMIDDAY MOVEMENT SERIES: $28,625 · OtherMIDDAY MOVEMENT SERIESART IN THE ANTILLES: $28,500 · OtherART IN THE ANTILLESIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDANZA ORGANICA VIA MARSHA PARILLA: $9,500 · OtherDANZA ORGANICA VIA MARSHA PARILLADIGITAL SOUP VIA LANI ASUNCION LLC: $9,500 · OtherDIGITAL SOUP VIA LANI ASUNCION LLCTINY SEED PROJECT INC: $22,500 · Environment
Arts & Culture$206,000Other$128,125Environment$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUNAMIS INC: $48,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetABILITIES DANCE INC: $42,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetARTS & BUSINESS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $42,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetThe Flavor Continues Corporation: $42,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetARTS ADMINISTRATORS OF COLOR DMV NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTINY SEED PROJECT INC: $22,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMASSCREATIVE INC: $22,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSTUDIO AT 550: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetStageSource Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUNAMIS INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILITIES DANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS & BUSINESS COUNCIL OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds The Flavor Continues Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ARTS ADMINISTRATORS OF COLOR DMV NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds TINY SEED PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSCREATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO AT 550 ↗
  • Who funds StageSource Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barr FoundationMA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barr Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Foley Hoag Foundation · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arts Connect International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arts Connect International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Masscreative Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Studio at 550: 10% of income from government
  • StageSource Inc: 10% of income from government
  • The Flavor Continues Corporation: 8% of income from government
  • Abilities Dance Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Dunamis Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Tiny Seed Project Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arts Connect International Inc?

Find your warmest path to Arts Connect International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arts Connect International’s filings →

More from the funding graph